Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26775192›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2016

The relationships between the amount of spared tissue, percent signal change, and accuracy in semantic processing in aphasia.

Jordyn A Sims, Kushal Kapse, Peter Glynn, Chaleece Sandberg, Yorghos Tripodis, Swathi Kiran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Treatment-induced neural reorganization in aphasia is language-domain specific: Evidence from a large-scale fMRI study.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jordyn A SimsAphasia Research Laboratory, Boston University, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 635 Commonwealth Ave., Boston MA 02215, USA. Electronic address: jordyn.sims@gmail.com.
Kushal KapseAphasia Research Laboratory, Boston University, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 635 Commonwealth Ave., Boston MA 02215, USA.
Peter GlynnNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Chaleece SandbergPennsylvania State University, College of Health and Human Development, Ford Building, State College, PA 16801, USA.
Yorghos TripodisDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Boston University, 801 Massachusetts Ave., Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Swathi KiranAphasia Research Laboratory, Boston University, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 635 Commonwealth Ave., Boston MA 02215, USA. Electronic address: kirans@bu.edu.
Boston University · USNorthwestern University · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Application of Multimodal Imaging Techniques to Examine Language Recovery in PostK18DC011517 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KIRAN, SWATHI · 2011 to 2012
$250k
Changes in Neural Patterns in Persons with Aphasia Following Theory-based GeneratF31DC011220 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SANDBERG, CHALEECE WYATT · 2012 to 2013
$48k
NIDCD NIH HHS 1K18DC011517-01NIDCD NIH HHS 5F31DC011220NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC011220NIDCD NIH HHS K18 DC011517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery from aphasia, loss of language following a cerebrovascular incident (stroke), is a complex process involving both left and right hemispheric regions. In our study, we analyzed the relationships between semantic processing behavioral data, lesion size and location, and percent signal change from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. This study included 14 persons with aphasia in the chronic stage of recovery (six or more months post stroke), along with normal controls, who performed semantic processing tasks of determining whether a written semantic feature matched a picture or whether two written words were related. Using region of interest (ROI) analysis, we found that left inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularis and pars triangularis, despite significant damage, were the only regions to correlate with behavioral accuracy. Additionally, bilateral frontal regions including superior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, and anterior cingulate appear to serve as an assistive network in the case of damage to traditional language regions that include inferior frontal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, and angular gyrus. Right hemisphere posterior regions including right middle temporal gyrus, right supramarginal gyrus, and right angular gyrus are engaged in the case of extensive damage to left hemisphere language regions. Additionally, right inferior frontal gyrus pars orbitalis is presumed to serve a monitoring function. These results reinforce the importance of the left hemisphere in language processing in aphasia, and provide a framework for the relative importance of left and right language regions in the brain.

Indexed as

SemanticsAgedAphasiaBrainBrain MappingCerebrovascular CirculationChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryLanguage TestsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsOxygenOxygenAphasiafMRILanguage recoveryLesion mappingRegions of interest (ROI)

Identifiers

PMID26775192
PMCPMC4808330
OpenAlexW2238156962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.