ArticleBiological psychiatry2016
Reply to: High-Fat Diet-Induced Dysbiosis as a Cause of Neuroinflammation.
Article in Biological psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interplay of Good Bacteria and Central Nervous System: Cognitive Aspects and Mechanistic Considerations.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- High fat diet alters gut microbiota but not spatial working memory in early middle-aged Sprague Dawley rats.PloS one · 2019Article
- The Gut Microbiome Modulates the Changes in Liver Metabolism and in Inflammatory Processes in the Brain of Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress Rats.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26774965What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.