Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26774786›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

The Forebrain Song System Mediates Predictive Call Timing in Female and Male Zebra Finches.

Jonathan I Benichov, Sam E Benezra, Daniela Vallentin, Eitan Globerson, Michael A Long, Ofer Tchernichovski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Music and Brain Circuitry: Strategies for Strengthening Evidence-Based Research for Music-Based Interventions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A feedforward inhibitory premotor circuit for auditory-vocal interactions in zebra finches.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan I BenichovDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, USA; Doctoral Program in Biology, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: jonathan.benichov@gmail.com.
Sam E BenezraNeuroscience Institute and Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Daniela VallentinNeuroscience Institute and Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Eitan GlobersonGonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel; Jerusalem Academy of Music and Dance, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Michael A LongNeuroscience Institute and Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Ofer TchernichovskiDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, USA.

Funding

BEHAVIORAL MECHANISMS OF VOCAL IMITATIONR01DC004722 · NIDCD · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI TCHERNICHOVSKI, OFER · 2001 to 2018
$5.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dichotomy between vocal learners and non-learners is a fundamental distinction in the study of animal communication. Male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) are vocal learners that acquire a song resembling their tutors', whereas females can only produce innate calls. The acoustic structure of short calls, produced by both males and females, is not learned. However, these calls can be precisely coordinated across individuals. To examine how birds learn to synchronize their calls, we developed a vocal robot that exchanges calls with a partner bird. Because birds answer the robot with stereotyped latencies, we could program it to disrupt each bird's responses by producing calls that are likely to coincide with the bird's. Within minutes, the birds learned to avoid this disruptive masking (jamming) by adjusting the timing of their responses. Notably, females exhibited greater adaptive timing plasticity than males. Further, when challenged with complex rhythms containing jamming elements, birds dynamically adjusted the timing of their calls in anticipation of jamming. Blocking the song system cortical output dramatically reduced the precision of birds' response timing and abolished their ability to avoid jamming. Surprisingly, we observed this effect in both males and females, indicating that the female song system is functional rather than vestigial. We suggest that descending forebrain projections, including the song-production pathway, function as a general-purpose sensorimotor communication system. In the case of calls, it enables plasticity in vocal timing to facilitate social interactions, whereas in the case of songs, plasticity extends to developmental changes in vocal structure.

Indexed as

LearningVocalization, AnimalAnimalsFemaleFinchesMaleProsencephalonReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID26774786
PMCPMC4747672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.