ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reference-free k-mer based dissimilarity measures for metagenomes comparison.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Elucidating Transitions ofJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2026Article
- DNA extraction and virome processing methods strongly influence recovered human gut viral community characteristics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Deep learning decodes species-specific codon usage signatures in Brassica from coding sequences.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prokrustean Graph: A substring index for rapid k-mer size analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrating sequence composition information into microbial diversity analyses with k-mer frequency counting.mSystems · 2025Article
- K-mer-based Approaches to Bridging Pangenomics and Population Genetics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Review
- A survey of k-mer methods and applications in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Towards predicting the geographical origin of ancient samples with metagenomic data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Distribution rules of 8-mer spectra and characterization of evolution state in animal genome sequences.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Previously unmeasured genetic diversity explains part of Lewontin's paradox in abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Application and Comparison of Machine Learning and Database-Based Methods in Taxonomic Classification of High-Throughput Sequencing Data.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Determinants of associations between codon and amino acid usage patterns of microbial communities and the environment inferred based on a cross-biome metagenomic analysis.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2023Article
- Comparison of k-mer-basedMicrobiome research reports · 2023Article
- A convenient correspondence between k-mer-based metagenomic distances and phylogenetically-informed β-diversity measures.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- AMAnD: an automated metagenome anomaly detection methodology utilizing DeepSVDD neural networks.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Microbial characterization based on multifractal analysis of metagenomes.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- RiboTaxa: combined approaches for rRNA genes taxonomic resolution down to the species level from metagenomics data revealing novelties.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Article
- Phylogenetically diverse diets favor more complex venoms in North American pitvipers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA rapidly increasing flow of genomic data requires the development of efficient methods for obtaining its compact representation. Feature extraction facilitates classification, clustering and model analysis for testing and refining biological hypotheses. "Shotgun" metagenome is an analytically challenging type of genomic data - containing sequences of all genes from the totality of a complex microbial community. Recently, researchers started to analyze metagenomes using reference-free methods based on the analysis of oligonucleotides (k-mers) frequency spectrum previously applied to isolated genomes. However, little is known about their correlation with the existing approaches for metagenomic feature extraction, as well as the limits of applicability. Here we evaluated a metagenomic pairwise dissimilarity measure based on short k-mer spectrum using the example of human gut microbiota, a biomedically significant object of study.
resultsWe developed a method for calculating pairwise dissimilarity (beta-diversity) of "shotgun" metagenomes based on short k-mer spectra (5 ≤ k ≤ 11). The method was validated on simulated metagenomes and further applied to a large collection of human gut metagenomes from the populations of the world (n=281). The k-mer spectrum-based measure was found to behave similarly to one based on mapping to a reference gene catalog, but different from one using a genome catalog. This difference turned out to be associated with a significant presence of viral reads in a number of metagenomes. Simulations showed limited impact of bacterial genetic variability as well as sequencing errors on k-mer spectra. Specific differences between the datasets from individual populations were identified.
conclusionsOur approach allows rapid estimation of pairwise dissimilarity between metagenomes. Though we applied this technique to gut microbiota, it should be useful for arbitrary metagenomes, even metagenomes with novel microbiota. Dissimilarity measure based on k-mer spectrum provides a wider perspective in comparison with the ones based on the alignment against reference sequence sets. It helps not to miss possible outstanding features of metagenomic composition, particularly related to the presence of an unknown bacteria, virus or eukaryote, as well as to technical artifacts (sample contamination, reads of non-biological origin, etc.) at the early stages of bioinformatic analysis. Our method is complementary to reference-based approaches and can be easily integrated into metagenomic analysis pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.