Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26774008›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2016

Development of a Health Screening Package Under the Universal Health Coverage: The Role of Health Technology Assessment.

Yot Teerawattananon, Pritaporn Kingkaew, Tanunya Koopitakkajorn, Sitaporn Youngkong, Nattha Tritasavit, Patsri Srisuwan, Sripen Tantivess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yot TeerawattananonHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Pritaporn KingkaewHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Tanunya KoopitakkajornHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Sitaporn YoungkongHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Nattha TritasavitHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP) International Unit, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Patsri SrisuwanFamily Practice Outpatient Department, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sripen TantivessHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reports the systematic development of a population-based health screening package for all Thai people under the universal health coverage (UHC). To determine major disease areas and health problems for which health screening could mitigate health burden, a consultation process was conducted in a systematic, participatory, and evidence-based manner that involved 41 stakeholders in a half-day workshop. Twelve diseases/health problems were identified during the discussion. Subsequently, health technology assessments, including systematic review and meta-analysis of health benefits as well as economic evaluations and budget impact analyses of corresponding population-based screening interventions, were completed. The results led to advice against elements of current clinical practice, such as annual chest X-rays and particular blood tests (e.g. kidney function test), and indicated that the introduction of certain new population-based health screening programs, such as for chronic hepatitis B, would provide substantial health and economic benefits to the Thais. The final results were presented to a wide group of stakeholders, including decision-makers at the Ministry of Public Health and the public health insurance schemes, to verify and validate the findings and policy recommendations. The package has been endorsed by the Thai UHC Benefit Package Committee for implementation in fiscal year 2016.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsDecision MakingDeveloping CountriesEconomics, MedicalHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services ResearchHumansMass ScreeningTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalThailandUniversal Health Insurancehealth technology assessmentlow- and middle-income countriesscreening packageuniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID26774008
PMCPMC5066643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.