Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26773423›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2016

A review of hair product use on breast cancer risk in African American women.

Laura Stiel, Paris B Adkins-Jackson, Phyllis Clark, Eudora Mitchell, Susanne Montgomery

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura StielDepartment of Social Work and Social Ecology, Loma Linda University, San Bernardino, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-8340
Paris B Adkins-JacksonAsante Wellness, LLC, Los Angeles, California.
Phyllis ClarkHealthy Heritage, Riverside, California.
Eudora MitchellQuinn Community Outreach Corporation, Moreno Valley, California.
Susanne MontgomerySchool of Behavioral Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.
Loma Linda University · USCalifornia Wellness Foundation · USEnglish Heritage · GBMoreno Valley College · US

Funding

Research Training/Education CoreP20MD006988 · NIMHD · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI CASIANO, CARLOS A. · 2012 to 2016
$6.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD006988NIMHD NIH HHS P20MD006988.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence rate of breast cancer for African American women has recently converged with that of non-Hispanic White women in the United States, although African Americans have a higher mortality rate due to this disease. Although most research exploring health disparities associated with this phenomenon has focused on differences between women based on biology and behavior, both the academic and lay communities have begun to explore the potential role of environmental exposure to estrogen and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). This study reviews the current state of the science associating one such means of exposure, hair products containing EDCs, with breast cancer risk in African American women. We found a growing body of evidence linking: (1) environmental estrogen and EDC exposures to breast cancer risk, (2) the presence of such chemicals in personal care products, including hair products, and (3) the use of certain hair products with potential breast cancer risk in African Americans. At the same time, there is also increasing concern in the lay community about this risk. These results indicate the need for additional research, and the opportunity to benefit from strategic partnerships in community-collaborative approaches in order to better understand the potential "cost of beauty."

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsEnvironmental ExposureEstrogensFemaleHair PreparationsHumansParabensPhthalic AcidsRisk FactorsWomen's HealthEstrogensHair PreparationsParabensphthalic acidPhthalic AcidsAfrican Americansbreast neoplasmshairhealth status disparitieswomen's health

Identifiers

PMID26773423
PMCPMC4799949
OpenAlexW2238356534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.