Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26773191›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2016

Differences in infant feeding practices by mode of conception in a United States cohort.

Kara A Michels, Sunni L Mumford, Rajeshwari Sundaram, Erin M Bell, Scott C Bello, Edwina H Yeung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Influential Factors of Breastfeeding after Assisted Reproduction: A Spanish Cohort.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fertility treatment use and breastfeeding outcomes.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kara A MichelsDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Sunni L MumfordDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Rajeshwari SundaramDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Erin M BellDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany School of Public Health, Rensselaer, New York; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany School of Public Health, Rensselaer, New York.
Scott C BelloCapitalCare Pediatrics-Troy, Troy, New York.
Edwina H YeungDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland. Electronic address: yeungedw@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Infertility Treatment, Child Growth and Development Through Age Three YearsZIAHD008826 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI YEUNG, EDWINA · 2009 to 2025
$9.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999NICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700019CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201200005C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify associations between fertility treatment use (assisted reproductive technologies, ovulation induction, and artificial insemination) and subsequent infant feeding practices.

designThe Upstate KIDS population-based cohort enrolled mothers who delivered live births in New York (2008-2010), sampling on fertility treatment and plurality.

settingNot applicable. PATIENT(S): Data regarding singletons and one randomly selected infant between twins were used. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mothers reported breast feeding and formula feeding practices at 4, 8, and 12 months postpartum. Modified Poisson regression was used to compare risks for feeding practices by mode of conception. Marginal structural models were used to estimate the controlled direct effects of fertility treatment on feeding, independent of preterm birth. RESULT(S): Among 4,591 mothers, 1,361 (30%) conceived with the use of fertility treatments. Mothers who used fertility treatments were less likely to breast feed to 12 months after birth and were more likely to provide formula, solids, and juice by 4 months than mothers who did not conceive with treatments. Fertility treatment remained associated with breast feeding cessation and formula feeding in mediation analyses, suggesting that preterm birth does not fully explain these associations. CONCLUSION(S): Women who conceived with the use of fertility treatments were less likely to breast feed later in infancy and were more likely to provide formula, solids, and juice earlier in infancy. Our analyses accounted for confounding and preterm birth, but other contributing factors may include difficulties feeding twins or workplace breast feeding accommodations.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAdultBottle FeedingBreast FeedingCohort StudiesFemaleFertilizationHumansInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornNew YorkPregnancyReproductive Techniques, AssistedUnited Statesassisted reproductive techniquesBreast feedinginfant foodinfant nutritional physiologic phenomena

Identifiers

PMID26773191
PMCPMC4821670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.