Trial reportBosnian journal of basic medical sciences2016
Comparison of three different regimens against Helicobacter pylori as a first-line treatment: A randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment ofThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026Guideline
- Evidence based guidelines for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Korea 2020.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2021Guideline
- Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Treatment ofGut and liver · 2021Guideline
- Sequential versus concomitant therapy for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Guideline
- Ten-Day Concomitant, 10-Day Sequential, and 7-Day Triple Therapy as First-Line Treatment forGut and liver · 2019Trial
- Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea: 2025 Revised Edition.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- Review Article: Classic Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection-Questions Focused on Clinical Practice.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Comparison of bismuth and concomitant therapy forFuture science OA · 2025Article
- Concomitant and Bismuth Quadruple Therapy forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Standard Bismuth Quadruple Therapy versus Concomitant Therapy for the First-Line Treatment ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Preclinical and Clinical Studies Published in Medical Journals of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Methodology Issues.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2020Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Standard Triple Therapy Plus Probiotics or Concomitant Therapy forGut and liver · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatments with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (QT), sequential therapy (ST), or concomitant therapy (CT) have been proposed as empirical first-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of 10 days bismuth-containing quadruple QT, 10 days ST, and 10 days CT with as first-line treatments for H. pylori in a randomized crossover study. The subjects were randomly divided into three groups. The first 130 patients were treated with rabeprazole, bismuth potassium citrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline for 10 days. The second 130 patients in the sequential group were treated with rabeprazole and amoxicillin for 5 days, and then rabeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole for an additional 5 days. The last 130 patients in the concomitant group were treated with rabeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by urea breath test at 6 weeks. The primary outcome was eradication rates of first-line treatment by intention to treat and per protocol (PP) analyzes. There was no difference between the average ages and the male/female ratio of the groups. The PP analysis was performed on 121, 119, and 118 patients in the QT, ST, and CT groups, respectively. In the PP analysis, the successful eradication 94.2% (114/121), 95.0% (113/119), and 95.8% (113/118) the QT, ST, and CT groups, respectively. There was no significant difference among the three groups (p = 0.86). 10 days QT, ST, and CT are highly effective as empirical first-line therapies for H. pylori in the region with high clarithromycin resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.