Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26773020›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Update on NHANES Dietary Data: Focus on Collection, Release, Analytical Considerations, and Uses to Inform Public Policy.

Namanjeet Ahluwalia, Johanna Dwyer, Ana Terry, Alanna Moshfegh, Clifford Johnson

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 671 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
671citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05026333 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study Aimed to Determine the Optimal Design for the UCLA/Danone Probiotic Intervention Study Related to Stress

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsStress, Psychological, AnxietyArmsCognitive Stress Testing
NCT06919536 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Controlled Feeding With 24 Hour Recall

TypeobservationalSponsorTexas Tech UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled75ConditionsEvaluate Accuracy 24 Dietary RecallArmsNo intervention (observational study)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

671 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

611 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Namanjeet AhluwaliaNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD; n.ahluwalia@cdc.gov.
Johanna DwyerOffice of Dietary Supplements, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and.
Ana TerryNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD;
Alanna MoshfeghFood Surveys Research Group, USDA, Beltsville, MD.
Clifford JohnsonNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NHANES is the cornerstone for national nutrition monitoring to inform nutrition and health policy. Nutritional assessment in NHANES is described with a focus on dietary data collection, analysis, and uses in nutrition monitoring. NHANES has been collecting thorough data on diet, nutritional status, and chronic disease in cross-sectional surveys with nationally representative samples since the early 1970s. Continuous data collection began in 1999 with public data release in 2-y cycles on ∼10,000 participants. In 2002, the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the NHANES dietary component were merged, forming a consolidated dietary data collection known as What We Eat in America; since then, 24-h recalls have been collected on 2 d using the USDA's Automated Multiple-Pass Method. Detailed and targeted food-frequency questionnaires have been collected in some NHANES cycles. Dietary supplement use data have been collected (in detail since 2007) so that total nutrient intakes can be described for the population. The continuous NHANES can adapt its content to address emerging public health needs and reflect federal priorities. Changes in data collection methods are made after expert input and validation/crossover studies. NHANES dietary data are used to describe intake of foods, nutrients, food groups, and dietary patterns by the US population and large sociodemographic groups to plan and evaluate nutrition programs and policies. Usual dietary intake distributions can be estimated after adjusting for day-to-day variation. NHANES remains open and flexible to incorporate improvements while maintaining data quality and providing timely data to track the nation's nutrition and health status. In summary, NHANES collects dietary data in the context of its broad, multipurpose goals; the strengths and limitations of these data are also discussed in this review.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorHealth PolicyPublic HealthResearch DesignHumansNutrition SurveysUnited Statesdietary assessmentepidemiologynutritional surveillancenutrition databasesnutrition policypublic policyusual intake

Identifiers

PMID26773020
PMCPMC4717880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.