Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26773013›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Essential Nutrient Interactions: Does Low or Suboptimal Magnesium Status Interact with Vitamin D and/or Calcium Status?

Andrea Rosanoff, Qi Dai, Sue A Shapses

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Magnesium and imidazole propionate.Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 2021
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea RosanoffCenter for Magnesium Education and Research, Pahoa, HI; arosanoff@gmail.com.
Qi DaiVanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; and.
Sue A ShapsesRutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

NUTRITIONAL REGULATION OF BONE TURNOVERR01AG012161 · NIA · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI SHAPSES, SUE AMY · 2000 to 2014
$3.4M
Translating gene-calcium interactions to precision medicine for colorectal cancerU01CA182364 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAI, QI, EDWARDS, TODD L · 2014 to 2019
$2.9M
Personalized Prevention of Colorectal CancerR01CA149633 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAI, QI, YU, CHANG · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
NUTRITIONAL REGULATION OF BONE TURNOVERR29AG012161 · NIA · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI SHAPSES, SUE AMY · 1994 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS R01CA149633NCI NIH HHS U01 CA182364NCI NIH HHS U01CA182364NIA NIH HHS AG12161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although much is known about magnesium, its interactions with calcium and vitamin D are less well studied. Magnesium intake is low in populations who consume modern processed-food diets. Low magnesium intake is associated with chronic diseases of global concern [e.g., cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and skeletal disorders], as is low vitamin D status. No simple, reliable biomarker for whole-body magnesium status is currently available, which makes clinical assessment and interpretation of human magnesium research difficult. Between 1977 and 2012, US calcium intakes increased at a rate 2-2.5 times that of magnesium intakes, resulting in a dietary calcium to magnesium intake ratio of >3.0. Calcium to magnesium ratios <1.7 and >2.8 can be detrimental, and optimal ratios may be ∼2.0. Background calcium to magnesium ratios can affect studies of either mineral alone. For example, US studies (background Ca:Mg >3.0) showed benefits of high dietary or supplemental magnesium for CVD, whereas similar Chinese studies (background Ca:Mg <1.7) showed increased risks of CVD. Oral vitamin D is widely recommended in US age-sex groups with low dietary magnesium. Magnesium is a cofactor for vitamin D biosynthesis, transport, and activation; and vitamin D and magnesium studies both showed associations with several of the same chronic diseases. Research on possible magnesium and vitamin D interactions in these human diseases is currently rare. Increasing calcium to magnesium intake ratios, coupled with calcium and vitamin D supplementation coincident with suboptimal magnesium intakes, may have unknown health implications. Interactions of low magnesium status with calcium and vitamin D, especially during supplementation, require further study.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeNutritional StatusCalciumChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMagnesiumMagnesium DeficiencyMaleVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyCalciumMagnesiumVitamin Dcalciumcalcium/magnesium ratioessential mineral interactionsmagnesiumnutrient interactionsvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID26773013
PMCPMC4717874
OpenAlexW2274109384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.