Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26772996›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2016

Genome Reduction Uncovers a Large Dispensable Genome and Adaptive Role for Copy Number Variation in Asexually Propagated Solanum tuberosum.

Michael A Hardigan, Emily Crisovan, John P Hamilton, Jeongwoon Kim, Parker Laimbeer, Courtney P Leisner, Norma C Manrique-Carpintero, Linsey Newton, Gina M Pham, Brieanne Vaillancourt and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome-Wide Identification ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Michael A HardiganDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Emily CrisovanDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
John P HamiltonDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Jeongwoon KimDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.ORCID 0000-0002-7102-6799
Parker LaimbeerDepartment of Horticulture, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.
Courtney P LeisnerDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Norma C Manrique-CarpinteroDepartment of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Linsey NewtonDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Gina M PhamDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Brieanne VaillancourtDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Xueming YangDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Institute of Biotechnology, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3842-2041
Zixian ZengDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
David S DouchesDepartment of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.ORCID 0000-0002-0636-5356
Jiming JiangDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Richard E VeilleuxDepartment of Horticulture, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.ORCID 0000-0002-7852-4408
C Robin BuellDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 buell@msu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6727-4677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clonally reproducing plants have the potential to bear a significantly greater mutational load than sexually reproducing species. To investigate this possibility, we examined the breadth of genome-wide structural variation in a panel of monoploid/doubled monoploid clones generated from native populations of diploid potato (Solanum tuberosum), a highly heterozygous asexually propagated plant. As rare instances of purely homozygous clones, they provided an ideal set for determining the degree of structural variation tolerated by this species and deriving its minimal gene complement. Extensive copy number variation (CNV) was uncovered, impacting 219.8 Mb (30.2%) of the potato genome with nearly 30% of genes subject to at least partial duplication or deletion, revealing the highly heterogeneous nature of the potato genome. Dispensable genes (>7000) were associated with limited transcription and/or a recent evolutionary history, with lower deletion frequency observed in genes conserved across angiosperms. Association of CNV with plant adaptation was highlighted by enrichment in gene clusters encoding functions for environmental stress response, with gene duplication playing a part in species-specific expansions of stress-related gene families. This study revealed unique impacts of CNV in a species with asexual reproductive habits and how CNV may drive adaption through evolution of key stress pathways.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenetic VariationDNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, PlantGenotypeIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePhenotypePhylogenyPlant ProteinsReproduction, AsexualSolanum tuberosumSpecies SpecificityPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26772996
PMCPMC4790865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.