Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26772972›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2016

Linking clinician interaction and coordination to clinical performance in Patient-Aligned Care Teams.

Sylvia J Hysong, Candice L Thomas, Christiane Spitzmüller, Amber B Amspoker, LeChauncy Woodard, Varsha Modi, Aanand D Naik

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04356274 (Participatory System Dynamics vs Audit and Feedback), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04356274 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Participatory System Dynamics vs Audit and Feedback: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Mechanisms of Implementation Change to Expand Reach of Evidence-based Addiction and Mental Health Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorPalo Alto Veterans Institute for ResearchRan2019 to 2027Enrolled720ConditionsPTSD, Depression, Alcohol Use Disorder, Opioid Use DisorderArmsParticipatory System Dynamics (PSD), Audit and Feedback (AF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sylvia J HysongCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA. Sylvia.Hysong@va.gov.
Candice L ThomasDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Candice.thomas46@gmail.com.
Christiane SpitzmüllerDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. christianes@gmail.com.
Amber B AmspokerCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA. amspoker@bcm.edu.
LeChauncy WoodardCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA. lwoodard@bcm.edu.
Varsha ModiCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA. Varsha.Modi@va.gov.
Aanand D NaikCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA. naik@bcm.edu.
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Houston · USUniversity of St. Thomas - Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeam coordination within clinical care settings is a critical component of effective patient care. Less is known about the extent, effectiveness, and impact of coordination activities among professionals within VA Patient-Aligned Care Teams (PACTs). This study will address these gaps by describing the specific, fundamental tasks and practices involved in PACT coordination, their impact on performance measures, and the role of coordination task complexity. METHODS/

designFirst, we will use a web-based survey of coordination practices among 1600 PACTs in the national VHA. Survey findings will characterize PACT coordination practices and assess their association with clinical performance measures. Functional job analysis, using 6-8 subject matter experts who are 3rd and 4th year residents in VA Primary Care rotations, will be utilized to identify the tasks involved in completing clinical performance measures to standard. From this, expert ratings of coordination complexity will be used to determine the level of coordinative complexity required for each of the clinical performance measures drawn from the VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP). For objective 3, data collected from the first two methods will evaluate the effect of clinical complexity on the relationships between measures of PACT coordination and their ratings on the clinical performance measures. DISCUSSION: Results from this study will support successful implementation of coordinated team-based work in clinical settings by providing knowledge regarding which aspects of care require the most complex levels of coordination and how specific coordination practices impact clinical performance.

Indexed as

AdultClinical CompetenceFemaleHospitals, VeteransHumansMalePatient Care TeamPatient-Centered CarePeer ReviewPhysiciansPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID26772972
PMCPMC4714534
OpenAlexW2236252792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.