Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26772876›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2016

Synthesis and evaluation of multivalent M2pep peptides for targeting alternatively activated M2 macrophages.

Chayanon Ngambenjawong, Maryelise Cieslewicz, Joan G Schellinger, Suzie H Pun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Anti-cancer peptide-based therapeutic strategies in solid tumors.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chayanon NgambenjawongDepartment of Bioengineering and Molecular Engineering and Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Maryelise CieslewiczDepartment of Bioengineering and Molecular Engineering and Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Joan G SchellingerDepartment of Bioengineering and Molecular Engineering and Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Suzie H PunDepartment of Bioengineering and Molecular Engineering and Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: spun@uw.edu.

Funding

POTENTIATING BREAST CANCER THERAPIES BY TARGETING TUMOR-ASSOCIATED MACROPHAGER01CA177272 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PUN, SUZIE H. · 2014 to 2019
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA177272NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment in the majority of cancers is known to favor polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) to alternatively activated M2 phenotype, promoting disease progression and reducing patient survival. Effective therapy targeting this M2 macrophage population is thus a promising adjuvant to approved cancer therapies. One of the challenges in targeting M2-like TAMs is a lack of high affinity targeting ligand with good selectivity over anti-tumor M1-like TAMs. We have previously identified an M2 macrophage-targeting peptide (M2pep) that binds preferentially to murine M2 macrophages and M2-like TAMs. A fusion peptide of M2pep with pro-apoptotic peptide KLA (M2pepKLA) was further used to reduce TAM population in vivo but high concentrations and frequent dosing were required due to low binding affinity of M2pep for M2 macrophage. The goal of this study was to develop more potent TAM depletion constructs by increasing the valency of both the M2pep targeting and KLA drug domains. Divalent and tetravalent displays of M2pep ([M2pep]2-Biotin and [M2pep]4-Biotin) were synthesized and evaluated for improvement in binding avidity to the murine macrophages. High avidity and selective binding of [M2pep]2-Biotin to M2 macrophages were achieved with at least 10-fold lower concentration than required for monovalent M2pep activity. Increasing M2pep valency to four, however, resulted in a reduction in both binding activity and selectivity. Surprisingly, both divalent and tetravalent M2pep, without conjugation of any cytotoxic drug cargo, exhibited M2 macrophage-selective toxicity not observed in monovalent M2pep treatment. We next synthesized divalent M2pep with monovalent and divalent KLA ([M2pep]2-[KLA] and [M2pep]2-[KLA]2) to evaluate its enhanced potency compared to M2pepKLA. While both constructs were significantly more toxic than M2pepKLA to primary, bone marrow-derived M2 macrophage, desired selectivity was retained only with [M2pep]2-[KLA]. Finally, we evaluated all multivalent M2pep and M2pepKLA analogs using a syngeneic CT-26 tumor cell suspension. In this setting, [M2pep]4-Biotin and [M2pep]2-[KLA]2 exhibited selective toxicity to both M2-like TAMs and malignant cells but not to M1-like TAMs. Therefore, these constructs are promising anti-cancer constructs with dual-modality mechanisms: malignant cell killing and TAM-based immunomodulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBiotinBone Marrow CellsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPeptidesTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsBiotinPeptidesM2 macrophagesMultivalent displayTargeted drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID26772876
PMCPMC4747818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.