SynthesisBMC health services research2016
Context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for diabetes mellitus type 2: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Individual, health system, and contextual barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic metareview.Health research policy and systems · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of chronic care models for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Quality priorities related to the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: results from the COMPAS + quality improvement collaborative.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Exploration of understanding of integrated care from a public health perspective: A scoping review.Journal of public health research · 2023Article
- Barriers and Facilitators in the Implementation of Prevention Strategies for Chronic Disease Patients-Best Practice GuideLines and Policies' Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Stakeholders' experiences and perception on transitional care initiatives within an integrated care project in Belgium: a qualitative interview study.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Implementing a community specialist team to support the delivery of integrated diabetes care: experiences in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic.HRB open research · 2023Article
- Article
- Chronic care model in the diabetes pay-for-performance program in Taiwan: Benefits, challenges and future directions.World journal of diabetes · 2021Review
- Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives on the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis care journey: a qualitative study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2021Article
- Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium.International journal of integrated care · 2020Article
- Quality of health care according to people with Down syndrome, their parents and support staff-A qualitative exploration.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2020Article
- The Manage Care Model - Developing an Evidence-Based and Expert-Driven Chronic Care Management Model for Patients with Diabetes.International journal of integrated care · 2020Article
- Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care.BMC geriatrics · 2019Article
- The Generation of Integration: The Early Experience of Implementing Bundled Care in Ontario, Canada.The Milbank quarterly · 2018Article
- Blood Sugar Regulation for Cardiovascular Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: JACC Health Promotion Series.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2018Review
- How to Improve Integrated Care for People with Chronic Conditions: Key Findings from EU FP-7 Project INTEGRATE and Beyond.International journal of integrated care · 2017Article
- IT-supported integrated care pathways for diabetes: A compilation and review of good practices.International journal of care coordination · 2017Article
- Values Underpinning Integrated, People-Centred Health Services: Similarities and Differences among Actor Groups Across Europe.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntegrated care interventions for chronic conditions can lead to improved outcomes, but it is not clear when and why this is the case. This study aims to answer the following two research questions: First, what are the context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for people with type 2 diabetes? Second, what are the relationships between context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for people with type 2 diabetes?
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted for the period 2003-2013 in Cochrane and PubMed. Articles were included when they focussed on integrated care and type 2 diabetes, and concerned empirical research analysing the implementation of an intervention. Data extraction was performed using a common data extraction table. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The CMO model (context + mechanism = outcome) was used to study the relationship between context factors (described by the barriers and facilitators encountered in the implementation process and categorised at the six levels of the Implementation Model), mechanisms (defined as intervention types and described by their number of Chronic Care Model (sub-)components) and outcomes (the intentional and unintentional effects triggered by mechanism and context).
resultsThirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Most reported barriers to the implementation process were found at the organisational context level and most facilitators at the social context level. Due to the low number of articles reporting comparable quantitative outcome measures or in-depth qualitative information, it was not possible to make statements about the relationship between context, mechanisms and outcomes.
conclusionsEfficient resource allocation should entail increased investments at the organisational context level where most barriers are expected to occur. It is likely that investments at the social context level will also help to decrease the development of barriers at the organisational context level, especially by increasing staff involvement and satisfaction. If future research is to adequately inform practice and policy regarding the impact of these efforts on health outcomes, focus on the actual relationships between context, mechanisms and outcomes should be actively incorporated into study designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.