Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26772745›Full record

ArticleBiointerphases2016

Multimodal image fusion with SIMS: Preprocessing with image registration.

Jay Gage Tarolli, Anna Bloom, Nicholas Winograd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biointerphases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jay Gage TarolliDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, 104 Chemistry Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.
Anna BloomDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, 104 Chemistry Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.
Nicholas WinogradDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, 104 Chemistry Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.

Funding

Molecular Imaging of Biomaterials - Single CellsR01GM113746 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI WINOGRAD, NICHOLAS · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to utilize complementary imaging techniques to supply higher resolution data for fusion with secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) chemical images, there are a number of aspects that, if not given proper consideration, could produce results which are easy to misinterpret. One of the most critical aspects is that the two input images must be of the same exact analysis area. With the desire to explore new higher resolution data sources that exists outside of the mass spectrometer, this requirement becomes even more important. To ensure that two input images are of the same region, an implementation of the insight segmentation and registration toolkit (ITK) was developed to act as a preprocessing step before performing image fusion. This implementation of ITK allows for several degrees of movement between two input images to be accounted for, including translation, rotation, and scale transforms. First, the implementation was confirmed to accurately register two multimodal images by supplying a known transform. Once validated, two model systems, a copper mesh grid and a group of RAW 264.7 cells, were used to demonstrate the use of the ITK implementation to register a SIMS image with a microscopy image for the purpose of performing image fusion.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCopperImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMacrophagesMiceMultimodal ImagingSpectrometry, Mass, Secondary IonCopper

Identifiers

PMID26772745
PMCPMC5849047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.