Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26772736›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

PANasta Trial; Cattell Warren versus Blumgart techniques of panreatico-jejunostomy following pancreato-duodenectomy: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Christopher M Halloran, Kellie Platt, Abbie Gerard, Fotis Polydoros, Derek A O'Reilly, Dhanwant Gomez, Andrew Smith, John P Neoptolemos, Zahir Soonwalla, Mark Taylor and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pancreaticojejunostomy-a review of modern techniques.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020
    Review
  14. Open and Minimal Approaches to Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020
    Review
  15. Observational
  16. Reshaping the critical role of surgeons in oncology research.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. In Patients with a Soft Pancreas, a Thick Parenchyma, a Small Duct, and Fatty Infiltration Are Significant Risks for Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher M HalloranNational Institutes of Health Research Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit and Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK. halloran@liverpool.ac.uk.
Kellie PlattCancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Block C Waterhouse Building, 1-3 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK. kplatt@liverpool.ac.uk.
Abbie GerardCancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Block C Waterhouse Building, 1-3 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK. agerard@liverpool.ac.uk.
Fotis PolydorosCancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Block C Waterhouse Building, 1-3 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK. polydorf@liverpool.ac.uk.
Derek A O'ReillyDepartment of Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. Derek.O'Reilly@cmft.nhs.uk.
Dhanwant GomezQueen's Medical Center, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. Dhanny.Gomez@nuh.nhs.uk.
Andrew SmithDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Abdominal Medicine and Surgery CSU, St James's University Hospital, 3rd Floor Bexley Wing, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. AndrewM.Smith@leedsth.nhs.uk.
John P NeoptolemosNational Institutes of Health Research Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit and Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK. johnyboy@liverpool.ac.uk.
Zahir SoonwallaChurchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK. Zahir.Soonawalla@ouh.nhs.uk.
Mark TaylorMater Hospital, Belfast Health and Social care Trust, Crumlin Rd, Belfast, BT12 6AB, UK. Mark.Taylor@belfasttrust.hscni.net.
Jane M BlazebyBristol Center for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 2PS and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK. J.M.Blazeby@bristol.ac.uk.
Paula GhanehNational Institutes of Health Research Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit and Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK. paula@liverpool.ac.uk.
University of Liverpool · GBCancer Research UK · GBChurchill Hospital · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBMater Hospital · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11883Cancer Research UK 15957Cancer Research UK 16186Cancer Research UK 16791Cancer Research UK 17680Cancer Research UK 8968Cancer Research UK CRUKE/13/019Department of Health 08/29/02Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFailure of the pancreatic remnant anastomosis to heal following pancreato-duodenectomy is a major cause of significant and life-threatening complications, notably a post-operative pancreatic fistula. Recently, non-randomized trials have shown superiority of a most intuitive anastomosis (Blumgart technique), which involves both a duct-to-mucosa and a full-thickness pancreatic "U" stitch, in effect a mattress stitch, over a standard duct-mucosa technique (Cattell-Warren). The aim of this study is to examine if these findings remain within a randomized setting. METHODS/

designThe PANasta trial is a randomized, double-blinded multi-center study, whose primary aim is to assess whether a Blumgart pancreatic anastomosis (trial intervention) is superior to a Cattell-Warren pancreatic anastomosis (control intervention), in terms of pancreatic fistula rates. Patients with suspected malignancy of the pancreatic head, in whom a pancreato-duodenectomy is recommended, would be recruited from several UK specialist regional centers. The hypothesis to be tested is that a Blumgart anastomosis will reduce fistula rate from 20 to 10 %. Subjects will be stratified by research site, pancreatic consistency and diameter of pancreatic duct; giving a sample size of 253 per group. The primary outcome measure is fistula rate at the pancreatico-jejunostomy. Secondary outcome measures are: entry into adjuvant therapy, mortality, surgical complications, non-surgical complications, hospital stay, cancer-specific quality of life and health economic assessments. Enrolled patients will undergo pancreatic resection and be randomized immediately prior to pancreatic reconstruction. The operation note will only record "anastomosis constructed as per PANasta trial randomization," thus the other members of the trial team and patient are blinded. An inbuilt internal pilot study will assess the ability to randomize patients, while the construction of an operative manual and review of operative photographs will maintain standardization of techniques. DISCUSSION: The PANasta trial will be the first multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two types of duct-to-mucosa pancreatic anastomosis with surgical quality assurance.

trial registrationISRCTN52263879 . Date of registration 15 January 2015.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsAnastomosis, SurgicalDouble-Blind MethodHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreaticojejunostomySample Size

Identifiers

PMID26772736
PMCPMC4714471
OpenAlexW2233052242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.