Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26772196›Full record

ArticleGenome research2016

Assessment of megabase-scale somatic copy number variation using single-cell sequencing.

Kristin A Knouse, Jie Wu, Angelika Amon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Somatic Mosaicism in Brain Disorders.Annual review of pathology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Building the brain mosaic: an expanded view.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Chromosome instability and aneuploidy in the mammalian brain.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristin A KnouseKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA; Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;
Jie WuThe Barbara K. Ostrom (1978) Bioinformatics and Computing Facility in the Swanson Biotechnology Center, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Angelika AmonKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA;

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MATTHEW G. VANDER HEIDEN · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
PRE-DOCTORAL TRAINING IN THE BIOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32GM007287 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BELL, STEPHEN P., KEATING, AMY E · 1985 to 2019
$40.8M
Regulation of Mitosis by Proteolysis in YeastR01GM056800 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI AMON, ANGELIKA B · 2004 to 2015
$3.4M
Causes and consequences of aneuploidyR35GM118066 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI AMON, ANGELIKA B · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Regulation of mitosis by proteolysis in yeastR01CA206157 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI AMON, ANGELIKA B · 2016 to 2020
$1.4M
REGULATION OF MITOSIS BY PROTEOLYSIS IN YEASTR29GM056800 · NIGMS · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI AMON, ANGELIKA B · 1997 to 2003
$738k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051NCI NIH HHS P30-CA14051NCI NIH HHS R01 CA206157NIGMS NIH HHS GM056800NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056800NIGMS NIH HHS R29 GM056800NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118066NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007287NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Megabase-scale copy number variants (CNVs) can have profound phenotypic consequences. Germline CNVs of this magnitude are associated with disease and experience negative selection. However, it is unknown whether organismal function requires that every cell maintain a balanced genome. It is possible that large somatic CNVs are tolerated or even positively selected. Single-cell sequencing is a useful tool for assessing somatic genomic heterogeneity, but its performance in CNV detection has not been rigorously tested. Here, we develop an approach that allows for reliable detection of megabase-scale CNVs in single somatic cells. We discover large CNVs in 8%-9% of cells across tissues and identify two recurrent CNVs. We conclude that large CNVs can be tolerated in subpopulations of cells, and particular CNVs are relatively prevalent within and across individuals.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGene DosageHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSingle-Cell AnalysisComputational BiologyGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansMarkov ChainsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID26772196
PMCPMC4772019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.