Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26772061›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Psychiatry2016

Intensive community outreach for those at ultra high risk of psychosis: dilution, not solution.

Paolo Fusar-Poli, Frauke Schultze-Lutter, Jean Addington

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Outreach and support in South-London (OASIS) 2001-2020: Twenty years of early detection, prognosis and preventive care for young people at risk of psychosis.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of risk and protective factors.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2018
    Article
  15. Improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis: an overview.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paolo Fusar-PoliKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF, UK; OASIS service, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy. Electronic address: paolo.fusar-poli@kcl.ac.uk.
Frauke Schultze-LutterUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jean AddingtonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsPsychotic DisordersCase-Control StudiesCognition DisordersFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, CommunityHumansIntensive Care UnitsPharmaceutical SolutionsRiskRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologySolutionsTime FactorsPharmaceutical SolutionsSolutions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.