ArticleThe ISME journal2016
Potential sources of microbial colonizers in an initial soil ecosystem after retreat of an alpine glacier.
Article in The ISME journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Melting Mountains, Shifting Microbiomes: Reconsidering Microbial Roles in Post-Glacial Ecosystem Services.Current opinion in environmental sustainability · 2026Article
- The Biodiversity of Retreating Glaciers Leaves an Ecological Legacy in Emerging Soil Communities.Global change biology · 2026Article
- From disturbance to resilience: early microbial community establishment in landslide soils of New Zealand.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Article
- Disentangling bacterial diversity and biogeography in snow-covered regions.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Movement of bacteria in the soil and the rhizosphere.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Review
- Biodiversity in mountain soils above the treeline.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- Host-virome associations in the weathering crust of a rapidly retreating temperate Alpine glacier.Microbial genomics · 2025Article
- Determinism and stochasticity drive microbial community assembly and microbial interactions in calcareous glacier forefields.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Dual-Domain Primary Succession of Bacteria in Glacier Forefield Streams and Soils of a Maritime and Continental Glacier.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Ecological significance of Candidatus ARS69 and Gemmatimonadota in the Arctic glacier foreland ecosystems.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- The Spatial Dynamics of Diazotrophs in the Forefield of Three Tibetan Glaciers.Microbial ecology · 2024Article
- Microbial genetic potential differs among cryospheric habitats of the Damma glacier.Microbial genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Fungal and bacterial communities and their associations in snow-free and snow covered (sub-)alpine Pinus cembra forest soils.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Mineral substrate quality determines the initial soil microbial development in front of the Nordenskiöldbreen, Svalbard.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2023Article
- Microbial Community Structure and Metabolic Potential at the Initial Stage of Soil Development of the Glacial Forefields in Svalbard.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Glacial Water: A Dynamic Microbial Medium.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Effect of elevation on composition and diversity of fungi in the rhizosphere of a population ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Following the flow-Microbial ecology in surface- and groundwaters in the glacial forefield of a rapidly retreating glacier in Iceland.Environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Routes and rates of bacterial dispersal impact surface soil microbiome composition and functioning.The ISME journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid disintegration of alpine glaciers has led to the formation of new terrain consisting of mineral debris colonized by microorganisms. Despite the importance of microbial pioneers in triggering the formation of terrestrial ecosystems, their sources (endogenous versus exogenous) and identities remain elusive. We used 454-pyrosequencing to characterize the bacterial and fungal communities in endogenous glacier habitats (ice, sub-, supraglacial sediments and glacier stream leaving the glacier forefront) and in atmospheric deposition (snow, rain and aeolian dust). We compared these microbial communities with those occurring in recently deglaciated barren soils before and after snow melt (snow-covered soil and barren soil). Atmospheric bacteria and fungi were dominated by plant-epiphytic organisms and differed from endogenous glacier habitats and soils indicating that atmospheric input of microorganisms is not a major source of microbial pioneers in newly formed soils. We found, however, that bacterial communities in newly exposed soils resembled those of endogenous habitats, which suggests that bacterial pioneers originating from sub- and supraglacial sediments contributed to the colonization of newly exposed soils. Conversely, fungal communities differed between habitats suggesting a lower dispersal capability than bacteria. Yeasts putatively adapted to cold habitats characteristic of snow and supraglacial sediments were similar, despite the fact that these habitats were not spatially connected. These findings suggest that environmental filtering selects particular fungi in cold habitats. Atmospheric deposition provided important sources of dissolved organic C, nitrate and ammonium. Overall, microbial colonizers triggering soil development in alpine environments mainly originate from endogenous glacier habitats, whereas atmospheric deposition contributes to the establishment of microbial communities by providing sources of C and N.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.