Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26771904›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Estrogenic Activity of Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons Used in Printing Inks.

Patrick Tarnow, Christoph Hutzler, Stefan Grabiger, Karsten Schön, Tewes Tralau, Andreas Luch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Update of the risk assessment of mineral oil hydrocarbons in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick TarnowGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Berlin, Germany, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10598, Berlin, Germany.
Christoph HutzlerGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Berlin, Germany, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10598, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan GrabigerGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Berlin, Germany, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10598, Berlin, Germany.
Karsten SchönGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Berlin, Germany, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10598, Berlin, Germany.
Tewes TralauGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Berlin, Germany, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10598, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas LuchGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Berlin, Germany, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10598, Berlin, Germany.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of printing inks are based on mineral oils (MOs) which contain complex mixtures of saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons. Consumer exposure to these oils occurs either through direct skin contacts or, more frequently, as a result of MO migration into the contents of food packaging that was made from recycled newspaper. Despite this ubiquitous and frequent exposure little is known about the potential toxicological effects, particularly with regard to the aromatic MO fractions. From a toxicological point of view the huge amount of alkylated and unsubstituted compounds therein is reason for concern as they can harbor genotoxicants as well as potential endocrine disruptors. The aim of this study was to assess both the genotoxic and estrogenic potential of MOs used in printing inks. Mineral oils with various aromatic hydrocarbon contents were tested using a battery of in vitro assays selected to address various endpoints such as estrogen-dependent cell proliferation, activation of estrogen receptor α or transcriptional induction of estrogenic target genes. In addition, the comet assay has been applied to test for genotoxicity. Out of 15 MOs tested, 10 were found to potentially act as xenoestrogens. For most of the oils the effects were clearly triggered by constituents of the aromatic hydrocarbon fraction. From 5 oils tested in the comet assay, 2 showed slight genotoxicity. Altogether it appears that MOs used in printing inks are potential endocrine disruptors and should thus be assessed carefully to what extent they might contribute to the total estrogenic burden in humans.

Indexed as

InkPrintingCell LineCell ProliferationCells, CulturedComet AssayEndocrine DisruptorsHumansHydrocarbons, AromaticMineral OilReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTranscriptional ActivationEndocrine DisruptorsHydrocarbons, AromaticMineral Oil

Identifiers

PMID26771904
PMCPMC4714758
OpenAlexW2238670492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.