Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26770991›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes research2016

Assessment of Insulin Resistance in Subjects with Normal Glucose Tolerance, Hyperinsulinemia with Normal Blood Glucose Tolerance, Impaired Glucose Tolerance, and Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes (Prediabetes Insulin Resistance Research).

Guang Yang, Chunlin Li, Yanping Gong, Fusheng Fang, Hui Tian, Jian Li, Xiaoling Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Assessment of insulin sensitivity and secretion in patients with fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guang YangDepartment of Geriatric Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Chunlin LiDepartment of Geriatric Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Yanping GongDepartment of Geriatric Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Fusheng FangDepartment of Geriatric Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Hui TianDepartment of Geriatric Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Jian LiDepartment of Geriatric Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Xiaoling ChengDepartment of Geriatric Endocrinology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the differences in insulin resistance (IR) among subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), hyperinsulinemia with NGT (HINS), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

methods5 NGT, 25 HINS, 25 IGT, and 25 T2DM subjects participated in this research. The hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique (HECT) was performed in all of them to evaluate IR levels. The relative factors influencing IR were evaluated. The simple insulin sensitivity indices were calculated, and the correlation between each index and the M value was analyzed.

resultsThe M values of NGT, HINS, IGT, and T2DM groups were 11.88 ± 2.93 mg · kg(-1) · min(-1), 6.23 ± 1.73 mg · kg(-1) · min(-1), 6.37 ± 2.12 mg · kg(-1) · min(-1), and 6.19 ± 1.89 mg · kg(-1) · min(-1), respectively. M values in HINS, IGT, and T2DM groups were lower than those in the NGT group (P = 0.005); however, the differences among the HINS, IGT, and T2DM groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.835). The independent factors influencing the M value were waistline and fasting insulin level (FINS). The simple insulin sensitivity indices, especially Matsuda and Gutt index, were significantly associated with the M value (P < 0.01).

conclusionIR existed in the HINS, IGT, and T2DM groups, and IR levels were consistent in the three groups. The independent factors influencing IR were waistline and FINS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlucose IntoleranceGlucose Tolerance TestHumansHyperinsulinismInsulinInsulin ResistanceMaleMiddle AgedPrediabetic StateYoung AdultBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID26770991
PMCPMC4685128
OpenAlexW2192199174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.