ArticleSAGE open medicine2014
Development of an interprofessional program for cardiovascular prevention in primary care: A participatory research approach.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01418716 (A Program to TRANSform InTerprofessional Clinical Practices to Improve Cardiovascular Prevention in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Program to TRANSform InTerprofessional Clinical Practices to Improve Cardiovascular Prevention in Primary Care
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concordance of care processes between medical records and patient self-administered questionnaires.BMC family practice · 2019Trial
- "From Health Experts to Health Guides": Motivational Interviewing Learning Processes and Influencing Factors.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2024Article
- Motivational Interviewing Implementation in Primary Care: A "Terrifying Challenge" Becoming a "Professional Revelation".Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2024Article
- Use of co-design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Significance of traditional herbal medicine for dyslipidemia.American journal of translational research · 2023Review
- Dyslipidemia Fact Sheets in Korea 2020: an Analysis of Nationwide Population-based Data.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2021Article
- What should selective cardiometabolic prevention programmes in European primary care look like? A consensus-based design by the SPIMEU group.The European journal of general practice · 2019Article
- External facilitators and interprofessional facilitation teams: a qualitative study of their roles in supporting practice change.Implementation science : IS · 2016Article
- Action research methodology in clinical pharmacy: how to involve and change.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Article
- The prevention and management of chronic disease in primary care: recommendations from a knowledge translation meeting.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- Development of an interprofessional program for cardiovascular prevention in primary care: A participatory research approach.SAGE open medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe chronic care model provides a framework for improving the management of chronic diseases. Participatory research could be useful in developing a chronic care model-based program of interventions, but no one has as yet offered a description of precisely how to apply the approach.
objectivesAn innovative, structured, multi-step participatory process was applied to select and develop (1) chronic care model-based interventions program to improve cardiovascular disease prevention that can be adapted to a particular regional context and (2) a set of indicators to monitor its implementation.
methodsPrimary care clinicians (n = 16), administrative staff (n = 2), patients and family members (n = 4), decision makers (n = 5), researchers, and a research coordinator (n = 7) took part in the process. Additional primary care actors (n = 26) validated the program.
resultsThe program targets multimorbid patients at high or moderate risk of cardiovascular disease with uncontrolled hypertension, dyslipidemia or diabetes. It comprises interprofessional follow-up coordinated by case-management nurses, in which motivated patients are referred in a timely fashion to appropriate clinical and community resources. The program is supported by clinical tools and includes training in motivational interviewing. A set of 89 process and clinical indicators were defined.
conclusionThrough a participatory process, a contextualized interventions program to optimize cardiovascular disease prevention and a set of quality indicators to monitor its implementation were developed. Similar approach might be used to develop other health programs in primary care if program developers are open to building on community strengths and priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.