Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26770510›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Application of liver three-dimensional printing in hepatectomy for complex massive hepatocarcinoma with rare variations of portal vein: preliminary experience.

Nan Xiang, Chihua Fang, Yingfang Fan, Jian Yang, Ning Zeng, Jun Liu, Wen Zhu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Utilization of 3D printing technology in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Role of artificial intelligence in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Precise hepatectomy in the intelligent digital era.International journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nan XiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, The Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510280, China.
Chihua FangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, The Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510280, China.
Yingfang FanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, The Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510280, China.
Jian YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, The Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510280, China.
Ning ZengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, The Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510280, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, The Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510280, China.
Wen ZhuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, The Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510280, China.
Zhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo discuss the role of Liver 3D printing in the treatment of complex massive hepatocarcinoma with rare variations of portal vein.

methodsData of enhanced computed tomography (CT) were imported into the medical image three-dimensional visualization system (MI-3DVS) to create Standard Template Library (STL) files, which were read by 3D printer to construct life-size 3D physical liver model. The preoperative surgical planning was performed on the 3D model according to individualized segmentation, volume calculation, and virtual operation.

resultsThe 3D printing liver model was consistent with the model in MI-3DVS. The segment 4 portal vein (S4PV) was absent and variant S4PV originated from right anterior portal vein (RAPV). The preoperative surgical planning was designed according to the relationship between tumor and portal vein variation. Theoretically, the residual liver volume was 40.76%, if the right hemihepatctomy was carried out after the trunk of right portal vein (RPV) ligated. However, the actual residual volume was only 21.37% due to the variant S4PV originates from RAPV, thus, right trisegmentectomy would have to be performed. Interestingly, after optimization, the residual liver volume increased to 57.25% as narrow-margin right hemihepatectomy with the variant S4PV reserved were performed. The final resection was determined to be narrow-margin right hemihepatectomy. The actual surgical procedure was consistent with the preoperative surgical planning.

conclusionLiver 3D printing may be a safe and effective technique to improve the success rate of surgery and reduce the operation risk for patients with complex massive hepatocarcinoma with variations of portal vein.

Indexed as

hepatocarcinomaThree-dimensional printingthree-dimensional reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID26770510
PMCPMC4694410
OpenAlexW2413165459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.