Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26770478›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Propofol sedation versus no sedation in detection of pharyngeal and upper gastrointestinal superficial squamous cell carcinoma using endoscopic narrow band imaging: a multicenter prospective trial.

Yuqi He, Yuqing Zhao, Kuangi Fu, Yongqiang Du, Jin Yu, Jianxun Wang, Peng Jin, Xiaojun Zhao, Na Li, Hua Guo and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recent advances in diagnostic upper endoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yuqi HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Military General Hospital Beijing 100700, China.
Yuqing ZhaoDepartment of VIP, Beijing Military General Hospital Beijing 100700, China.
Kuangi FuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Military General Hospital Beijing 100700, China.
Yongqiang DuDepartment of Science, Tianjin University of Commerce Tianjin 300134, China.
Jin YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University Chongqing 400038, China.
Jianxun WangInstitute for Translational Medicine, College of Medicine, Qingdao University Qingdao 266021, China.
Peng JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Military General Hospital Beijing 100700, China.
Xiaojun ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Military General Hospital Beijing 100700, China.
Na LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Military General Hospital Beijing 100700, China.
Hua GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Military General Hospital Beijing 100700, China.
Jiandong LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, 285 Hospital of PLA Handan, Hebei 056001, China.
Fayun ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, 285 Hospital of PLA Handan, Hebei 056001, China.
Jianqiu ShengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Military General Hospital Beijing 100700, China.
The Military General Hospital of Beijing PLA · CNHebei University of Engineering · CNArmy Medical University · CNQingdao University · CNTianjin University of Commerce · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous propofol can provide a superior quality of sedation compared to standard sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, the utility of propofol sedation for the endoscopic early detection of superficial pharyngeal and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has not been investigated. In a multicenter, prospective trial, 255 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) were assigned to receive propofol sedation or no sedation according to their own willingness. The primary aim was to compare the detection rates of superficial cancer in the pharyngeal region and the esophagus between two groups. The secondary aim was to evaluate factors associated with technical adequacy. The detection rate was higher in the propofol sedation vs. no sedation group for H&N region (6.06% vs. 2.40%), but not significantly (P=0.22). However, the small lesion (less than 10 mm in diameter) detection rate was higher in sedation vs. no sedation group for H&N region (88.89% vs. 33.33%; P=0.048). The median time for pharyngeal observation in the sedation group was faster than in the no sedation group (20.6 s vs. 44.3 s; P<0.001). Ninety-five percent of H&N region evaluations were totally complete in sedation compared with sixty percent in the no sedation group (P<0.001). The overall p value indicated that only smoking habit was associated with incomplete pharyngeal observation (P<0.05), and it was more difficult to accomplish a complete pharyngeal observation in patients who smoked more than 10 packs per day. Intravenous propofol sedation compared to no intravenous sedation during conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy can facilitate a more complete pharyngeal examination and increase the detection rate of superficial H&N squamous cell carcinoma in high risk patients.

Indexed as

Esophageal squamous cell carcinomahead and neck cancerhigh-risk patientspropofol sedationsuperficial cancer

Identifiers

PMID26770478
PMCPMC4694378
OpenAlexW2395531354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.