ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Comparison of transcranial ultrasound and cranial MRI in evaluations of brain injuries from neonatal asphyxia.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neonatal cerebral imaging: feasibility and image quality using an MR-compatible incubator equipped with a 16-channel head coil.European radiology · 2026Article
- An Assessment of Motor Skills in Infants at Risk of Atypical Psychomotor Development Using the Vojta Method.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Development and characterization of transfontanelle photoacoustic imaging system for detection of intracranial hemorrhages and measurement of brain oxygenation:Photoacoustics · 2023Article
- Prediction of functional outcome using the novel asymmetric middle cerebral artery index in cryptogenic stroke patients.PloS one · 2019Article
- Overview of Cerebral Edema During Correction of Hyperglycemic Crises.The American journal of case reports · 2018Article
- Role of Transcranial Ultrasound and Doppler Studies to Evaluate Intracranial Pathologies in Preterm and High-risk Term Neonates.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Full-term infants with early-stage brain injuries from asphyxia were examined with two-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler to assess the use of ultrasound in evaluating early brain injuries after neonatal asphyxia. The sonographic features of ultrasound and color Doppler were compared to those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ultrasound was used to monitor the brain parenchyma, lateral ventricles, and cerebral hemodynamics in the asphyxia group and full-term control group 24, 48, and 72 h after birth. MRI and diffusion-weight imaging (DWI) were performed within 72 h. Cerebral edema changes were most obvious with ultrasound within 48 h of asphyxia, while the cerebral hemodynamic changes were most obvious within 24 h. These results suggested that ultrasound detected early cerebral edema better than MRI did.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26770434PMC4694334W2415500779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.