Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26770338›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

The CDKN2A-CDKN2B rs4977756 polymorphism and glioma risk: a meta-analysis.

Hongwei Lu, Yuantao Yang, Jihui Wang, Yang Liu, Ming Huang, Xinlin Sun, Yiquan Ke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongwei LuThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510282, China.
Yuantao YangThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510282, China.
Jihui WangThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510282, China.
Yang LiuThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510282, China.
Ming HuangThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510282, China.
Xinlin SunThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510282, China.
Yiquan KeThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510282, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between the rs4977756 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and glioma risk has been studied, but these studies have yielded conflicting results. In order to explore this association, we performed a meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and EMBASE database. Six articles including 12 case-control studies in English with 12022 controls and 6871 cases were eligible for the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted by ethnicity and source of controls. Our meta-analysis found that rs4977756 polymorphism was associated with glioma risks in homozygote, heterozygote, dominant, recessive and additive genetic models (GG versus AA: OR=1.55, 95% CI=1.42-1.69, Ph=0.996, I(2)=0.0%; AG versus AA: OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.12-1.28, Ph=0.934, I(2)=0.0%; recessive model: OR=1.39, 95% CI=1.28-1.50, Ph=0.995, I(2)=0.0%; dominant model: OR=1.29, 95% CI=1.21-1.37, Ph=0.923, I(2)=0.0%; additive model: OR=1.24, 95% CI=1.19-1.30, Ph=0.966, I(2)=0.0%). Moreover, our results suggested that CDKN2A-CDKN2B rs4977756 polymorphism was associated with a notable increased risk of glioma in Europeans. However, in Asians, we could not come to a conclusion because of lack of studies. Sensitivity analysis showed the omission of any study made no significant difference. No evidence of publication bias was produced. Our meta-analysis suggested that rs4977756 polymorphism was associated with increased risk of glioma. Moreover, additional studies should be further investigated to draw a more accurate conclusion.

Indexed as

CDKN2A-CDKN2BGliomameta-analysispolymorphismrs4977756

Identifiers

PMID26770338
PMCPMC4694238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.