Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26770332›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma rs1801282 C>G polymorphism is associated with polycystic ovary syndrome susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 7,069 subjects.

Sheng Zhang, Yafeng Wang, Heping Jiang, Chao Liu, Bin Sun, Shuchen Chen, Mingqiang Kang, Weifeng Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Investigation ofBioscience reports · 2019
    Article
  3. Relationship betweenCancer management and research · 2018
    Article
  4. Oncotarget · 2017
    Article
  5. Investigation ofOncotarget · 2017
    Article
  6. The relationship betweenOncoTargets and therapy · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sheng ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Changzhou No. 3 People's Hospital Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yafeng WangDepartment of Cardiology, The People's Hospital of Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture Jinghong, Yunnan Province, China.
Heping JiangEmergency Department, Affiliated Jintan People's Hospital of Jiangsu University Jintan, China.
Chao LiuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China.
Bin SunDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China.
Shuchen ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Union Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Mingqiang KangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Union Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Weifeng TangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu UniversityZhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China; Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Union Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical UniversityFuzhou, Fujian Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG) gene, a polymorphism (rs1801282 C>G), has been shown to change an amino acid residue and then results in alternation of PPARG function. A number of studies have explored the relationship between PPARG rs1801282 C>G variants and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) risk, but yielding inconsistent findings, especially in Asian population. This study aimed to assess the role of PPARG rs1801282 C>G polymorphism in susceptibility to PCOS. Databases of Pubmed, Embase and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) were searched until August 2, 2015. The association of PPARG 1801282 C>G polymorphism with PCOS risk was evaluated by crude odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Finally, there were twenty-three studies involving 3,458 PCOS cases and 3,611 controls included in our pooled analysis. Significant associations were identified between PPARG rs1801282 C>G variants and decreased PCOS risk in three genetic comparison models (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.89; P < 0.001 for G vs. C; OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68-0.89; P < 0.001 for GG+CG vs. CC and OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91; P = 0.001 for CG vs. CC). In a subgroup analysis by race, significant correlation was also observed between PPARG rs1801282 C>G variants and decreased PCOS risk in three genetic models: G vs. C (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97; P = 0.019) and GG+CG vs. CC (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.99; P = 0.033) among Caucasians and in one genetic models: G vs. C (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = 0.001) among Asians. In summary, our results demonstrate that PPARG rs1801282 C>G polymorphism may be a protective factor for PCOS.

Indexed as

meta-analysisperoxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaPolycystic ovary syndromepolymorphism

Identifiers

PMID26770332
PMCPMC4694232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.