Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26770330›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Association of rs7754840 G/C polymorphisms in CDKAL1 with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of 70141 subjects.

Muhadasi Tuerxunyiming, Patamu Mohemaiti, Hamulati Wufuer, Awaguli Tuheti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Pancreatic Beta-Cell Glucose Sensitivity.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pharmacogenetics of Type 2 Diabetes-Progress and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhadasi TuerxunyimingSchool of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi 830011, China.
Patamu MohemaitiSchool of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi 830011, China.
Hamulati WufuerXinjiang Medical University Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China.
Awaguli TuhetiSchool of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi 830011, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reported association of the CDKAL1 rs7754840 G/C gene polymorphism with T2DM susceptibility remains controversial. In this study, this association was further investigated using a meta-analysis of 33,149 patients and 36,992 controls from 32 independent studies. The random-effect models were used in order to evaluate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A significant relationship between the CDKAL1 rs7754840 G/C gene polymorphism and T2DM was observed under allelic (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.22, 1.55, P < 0.001), recessive (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.20-2.08, P < 0.001), dominant (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.21-1.33, P = 0.01), and homozygous (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.21-1.33, P < 0.001), and heterozygous (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93, P < 0.001). Overall, the CDKAL1 rs7754840 G/C gene polymorphism was found to be significantly associated with an increased T2DM risk; the C allele of the CDKAL1 rs7754840 G/C gene polymorphism may confer susceptibility to T2DM.

Indexed as

CDKAL1polymorphismtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID26770330
PMCPMC4694230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.