Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26770128›Full record

ReviewIntegrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.)2015

Part 2: Treatments for Chronic Gastrointestinal Disease and Gut Dysbiosis.

Matthew J Bull, Nigel T Plummer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Effects ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Engineering bacterial theranostics: from logic gates toFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Effect ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  15. The Probiotic VSL#3Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Celiac Disease.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew J Bullis a postdoctoral research associate in the Organisms and Environment Division at Cardiff University in Wales, United Kingdom. is a key research contributor for Pharmax.
Nigel T Plummeris a postdoctoral research associate in the Organisms and Environment Division at Cardiff University in Wales, United Kingdom. is a key research contributor for Pharmax.
University of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Part 1 of this review discussed the connection between the human gut microbiota and health. Manipulation of the intestinal microbiota holds promise as a prospective therapy for gut dysbiosis, ameliorating symptoms of gastrointestinal and systemic diseases and restoring health. The concept of probiotics has existed for more than 100 y, and modern research methods have established sound scientific support for the perceived benefits of probiotic bacteria, which mainly include Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium genera. On the basis of these evidence-based functional approaches, dietary interventions that supplement the normal diet with probiotics or prebiotics are now considered as potentially viable alternatives or adjuncts to the use of steroids, immunosuppressants, and/or surgical interventions. Studies investigating the impact on gastrointestinal disorders, such as diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); and systemic metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes and obesity, in response to the use of probiotics and prebiotics are reviewed. Further, fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is discussed as an exciting development in the treatment of gut dysbiosis using microbes.

Identifiers

PMID26770128
PMCPMC4566455
OpenAlexW2292014584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.