Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26769960›Full record

ArticleGenome research2016

Pervasive polymorphic imprinted methylation in the human placenta.

Courtney W Hanna, Maria S Peñaherrera, Heba Saadeh, Simon Andrews, Deborah E McFadden, Gavin Kelsey, Wendy P Robinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Epigenetics · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Imprinting and skeletal disorders: lessons from pseudohypoparathyroidism and related disorders.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bidirectional disruption ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Courtney W HannaEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom; Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom;
Maria S PeñaherreraDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3N1, Canada; Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada;
Heba SaadehEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom; Bioinformatics Group, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom;
Simon AndrewsBioinformatics Group, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom;
Deborah E McFaddenDepartment of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada.
Gavin KelseyEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom; Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom;
Wendy P RobinsonDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3N1, Canada; Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada;
Babraham Institute · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K011332/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The maternal and paternal copies of the genome are both required for mammalian development, and this is primarily due to imprinted genes, those that are monoallelically expressed based on parent-of-origin. Typically, this pattern of expression is regulated by differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that are established in the germline and maintained after fertilization. There are a large number of germline DMRs that have not yet been associated with imprinting, and their function in development is unknown. In this study, we developed a genome-wide approach to identify novel imprinted DMRs in the human placenta and investigated the dynamics of these imprinted DMRs during development in somatic and extraembryonic tissues. DNA methylation was evaluated using the Illumina HumanMethylation450 array in 134 human tissue samples, publicly available reduced representation bisulfite sequencing in the human embryo and germ cells, and targeted bisulfite sequencing in term placentas. Forty-three known and 101 novel imprinted DMRs were identified in the human placenta by comparing methylation between diandric and digynic triploid conceptions in addition to female and male gametes. Seventy-two novel DMRs showed a pattern consistent with placental-specific imprinting, and this monoallelic methylation was entirely maternal in origin. Strikingly, these DMRs exhibited polymorphic imprinted methylation between placental samples. These data suggest that imprinting in human development is far more extensive and dynamic than previously reported and that the placenta preferentially maintains maternal germline-derived DNA methylation.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenomic ImprintingFemaleHumansMalePlacentaPolymorphism, GeneticPregnancySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26769960
PMCPMC4889973
OpenAlexW2232856929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.