Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26769879›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

The Cost to Successfully Apply for Level 3 Medical Home Recognition.

Jacqueline R Halladay, Kathleen Mottus, Kristin Reiter, C Madeline Mitchell, Katrina E Donahue, Wilson M Gabbard, Kimberly Gush

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unpacking the patient-centered medical home.Health services research · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jacqueline R HalladayFrom the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG). Jacqueline_halladay@med.unc.edu.
Kathleen MottusFrom the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
Kristin ReiterFrom the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
C Madeline MitchellFrom the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
Katrina E DonahueFrom the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
Wilson M GabbardFrom the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
Kimberly GushFrom the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).

Funding

Understanding the Direct and Indirect Costs of Transformation to Medical HomesR03HS022629 · AHRQ · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HALLADAY, JACQUELINE R · 2013 to 2013
$100k
AHRQ HHS R031 R03 HS022629-01AHRQ HHS R03 HS022629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Committee for Quality Assurance patient-centered medical home recognition program provides practices an opportunity to implement medical home activities. Understanding the costs to apply for recognition may enable practices to plan their work.

methodsPractice coaches identified 5 exemplar practices (3 pediatric and 2 family medicine practices) that received level 3 recognition. This analysis focuses on 4 that received recognition in 2011. Clinical, informatics, and administrative staff participated in 2- to 3-hour interviews. We determined the time required to develop, implement, and maintain required activities. We categorized costs as (1) nonpersonnel, (2) developmental, (3) those used to implement activities, (4) those used to maintain activities, (5) those to document the work, and (6) consultant costs. Only incremental costs were included and are presented as costs per full-time equivalent (pFTE) provider.

resultsPractice size ranged from 2.5 to 10.5 pFTE providers, and payer mixes ranged from 7% to 43% Medicaid. There was variation in the distribution of costs by activity by practice, but the costs to apply were remarkably similar ($11,453-15,977 pFTE provider).

conclusionThe costs to apply for 2011 recognition were noteworthy. Work to enhance care coordination and close loops were highly valued. Financial incentives were key motivators. Future efforts to minimize the burden of low-value activities could benefit practices.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisHealth Plan ImplementationHumansNorth CarolinaOrganizational Case StudiesPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered CareQuality Assurance, Health CareUnited StatesCost ControlMedical HomePatient-centered CarePractice Management

Identifiers

PMID26769879
PMCPMC4878853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.