Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26769843›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Identification of stem-like cells and clinical significance of candidate stem cell markers in gastric cancer.

Xiaowei Zhang, Ruixi Hua, Xiaofeng Wang, Mingzhu Huang, Lu Gan, Zhenhua Wu, Jiejun Zhang, Hongqiang Wang, Yufan Cheng, Jin Li and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The IL-17 family in diseases: from bench to bedside.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaowei ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Ruixi HuaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaofeng WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Mingzhu HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Lu GanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhenhua WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jiejun ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Hongqiang WangDepartment of Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Zhoushan Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Yufan ChengDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jin LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Weijian GuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNZhoushan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existence of gastric cancer stem cells (CSCs) has not been definitively proven and specific cell surface markers for identifying gastric CSCs have largely not been identified. Our research aimed to isolate potential gastric CSCs and clarify their clinical significance, while defining markers for GCSC identification and verification. Here, we report that spheroid cells possess stem cell-like properties, and overexpress certain stem cell markers. CD133 or CD44-positive cells also exhibit properties of CSCs. The expression of Oct4, Sox2, Gli1, CD44, CD133, p-AKT, and p-ERK was significantly higher in metastatic lesions compared to that in primary lesions. Elevated expression of some of these proteins was correlated with a more aggressive phenotype and poorer prognosis, including Oct4, Sox2, Gli1, CD44, and p-ERK. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that only CD44 is an independent factor. Knockdown of CD44 down-regulated the stem cell-like properties, which was accompanied by the down-regulation of p-ERK and Oct4. Oct4 overexpression could reverse the decreased CSCs properties induced by CD44 knockdown. Taken together, our research revealed that spheroid cell culture, and CD133 or CD44-labeled FACS methods can be used to isolate gastric CSCs. Some CSC markers have clinical significance in predicting the prognosis. CD44 is an independent prognostic factor and maintains the properties of CSCs in CD44-p-ERK-Oct4 positive feedback loop.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesFlow CytometryHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsMiceMice, SCIDNeoplasm TransplantationNeoplastic Stem CellsOctamer Transcription Factor-3PrognosisRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingSOXB1 Transcription FactorsAC133 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD44 protein, humanExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesGLI1 protein, humanHyaluronan ReceptorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanPROM1 protein, humanRNA, Small InterferingSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription FactorsZinc Finger Protein GLI1cancer stem cellCD133CD44gastric cancerstem cell marker

Identifiers

PMID26769843
PMCPMC4891086
OpenAlexW2291038537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.