ArticleBMJ open2016
Staff perceptions on patient motives for attending GP-led urgent care centres in London: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Article
- Factors that influence inter-organisational integration: a qualitative exploration of service providers' perspectives from an integrated care initiative.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Urgent care centres for reducing the demand on emergency departments: a scoping review of published quantitative and qualitative studies.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
- 'Clinically unnecessary' use of emergency and urgent care: A realist review of patients' decision making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Review
- Tendency to contact general practice instead of self-care: a population vignette study.BJGP open · 2020Article
- Profile and Motivation of Patients Consulting in Emergency Departments While not Requiring Such a Level of Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- The impact of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a rapid realist review.BMJ open · 2019Review
- The decision-making process for unplanned admission to hospital unveiled in hospitalised older adults: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2018Article
- Describing team development within a novel GP-led urgent care centre model: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in New South Wales, Australia: who, what, where and why?BMJ open · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesGeneral practitioner (GP)-led urgent care centres were established to meet the growing demand for urgent care. Staff members working in such centres are central in influencing patients' choices about which services they use, but little is known about staff perceptions of patients' motives for attending urgent care. We hence aimed to explore their perceptions of patients' motives for attending such centres.
designA phenomenological, qualitative study, including semistructured interviews. The interviews were analysed using thematic content analysis.
setting2 GP-led urgent care centres in 2 academic hospitals in London.
participants15 staff members working at the centres including 8 GPs, 5 emergency nurse practitioners and 2 receptionists.
resultsWe identified 4 main themes: 'Confusion about choices', 'As if increase of appetite had grown; By what it fed on', 'Overt reasons, covert motives' and 'A question of legitimacy'. The participants thought that the centres introduce convenient and fast access for patients. So convenient, that an increasing number of patients use them as a regular alternative to their community GP. The participants perceived that patients attend the centres because they are anxious about their symptoms and view them as serious, cannot get an appointment with their GP quickly and conveniently, are dissatisfied with the GP, or lack self-care skills. Staff members perceived some motives as legitimate (an acute health need and difficulties in getting an appointment), and others as less legitimate (convenience, minor illness, and seeking quicker access to hospital facilities).
conclusionsThe participants perceived that patients attend urgent care centres because of the convenience of access relative to primary care, as well as sense of acuity and anxiety, lack self-care skills and other reasons. They perceived some motives as more legitimate than others. Attention to unmet needs in primary care can help in promoting balanced access to urgent care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.