Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26769476›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soils: bioaugmentation of autochthonous bacteria and toxicological assessment of the bioremediation process by means of Vicia faba L.

Monica Ruffini Castiglione, Lucia Giorgetti, Simone Becarelli, Giovanna Siracusa, Roberto Lorenzi, Simona Di Gregorio

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monica Ruffini CastiglioneDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, via Ghini 13, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Lucia GiorgettiNational Research Council (CNR), Institute of Biology and Agricultural Biotechnology (IBBA), Research Unit of Pisa, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Simone BecarelliDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, via Ghini 13, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Giovanna SiracusaDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, via Ghini 13, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Roberto LorenziDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, via Ghini 13, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Simona Di GregorioDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, via Ghini 13, 56126, Pisa, Italy. sdigregorio@biologia.unipi.it.
University of Pisa · ITDeleted Institution

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two bacterial strains, Achromobacter sp. (ACH01) and Sphingomonas sp. (SPH01), were isolated from a heavily polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated soil (5431.3 ± 102.3 ppm) for their capacity to use a mixture of anthracene, pyrene, phenanthrene and fluorene as sole carbon sources for growth and for the capacity to produce biosurfactants. The two strains were exploited for bioaugmentation in a biopile pilot plant to increase the bioavailability and the degradation of the residual PAH contamination (99.5 ± 7.1 ppm) reached after 9 months of treatment. The denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis (DGGE) profile of the microbial ecology of the soil during the experimentation showed that the bioaugmentation approach was successful in terms of permanence of the two strains in the soil in treatment. The bioaugmentation of the two bacterial isolates positively correlated with the PAH depletion that reached 7.9 ± 2 ppm value in 2 months of treatment. The PAH depletion was assessed by the loss of the phyto-genotoxicity of soil elutriates on the model plant Vicia faba L., toxicological assessment adopted also to determine the minimum length of the decontamination process for obtaining both the depletion of the PAH contamination and the detoxification of the soil at the end of the process. The intermediate phases of the bioremediation process were the most significant in terms of toxicity, inducing genotoxic effects and selective DNA fragmentation in the stem cell niche of the root tip. The selective DNA fragmentation can be related to the selective induction of cell death of mutant stem cells that can compromise offsprings.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAchromobacterBiodegradation, EnvironmentalPilot ProjectsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil PollutantsSphingomonasVicia fabaPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil PollutantsAchromobacter sp.BioaugmentationBiosurfactantsGenotoxicityPhytotoxicityPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsSphingomonas sp.Vicia faba L.

Identifiers

PMID26769476
OpenAlexW2235834392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.