Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26769427›Full record

ReviewEcoHealth2017

The Role of Animal Translocations in Conserving British Wildlife: An Overview of Recent Work and Prospects for the Future.

Ian Carter, Jim Foster, Leigh Lock

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in EcoHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian CarterNatural England, Unex House, Bourges Boulevard, Peterborough, PE1 1NG, UK. ian.carter@naturalengland.org.uk.
Jim FosterAmphibian & Reptile Conservation Trust, The Witley Centre, Witley, Godalming, Surrey, GU8 5QA, UK.
Leigh LockRoyal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, UK.
Natural England · GBRoyal Society for the Protection of Birds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We provide an overview of terrestrial animal translocations carried out for conservation purposes in Britain, summarising what has been achieved in recent decades and discussing the issues raised by this approach to conservation. In the last 40 years, at least nine species have been reintroduced following extinction in Britain (or at least one country within Britain), including five birds, one mammal, one amphibian and two invertebrates. Many more species have been translocated within Britain to establish additional populations in order to improve conservation status. We discuss the guidelines and protocols used to assess translocation projects in Britain, notably the IUCN guidelines, most recently revised in 2013. We also discuss the likely use of species translocations in future and suggest that, in our increasingly fragmented landscapes, they will have an important role to play in conservation restoration, especially for animals with limited mobility. Moving species around is a complex undertaking and our understanding of the inherent risks involved, including the risks from disease, has improved significantly in recent years. Conservation translocations should be considered in the context of species recovery targets and high standards should be maintained so that disease risks and other potentially negative impacts are minimised.

Indexed as

Animals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesAmphibiansAnimalsBirdsUnited KingdomBritainconservationdisease risksreintroductionspeciestranslocation

Identifiers

PMID26769427
OpenAlexW2269681870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.