Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26769407›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2016

A proposed staging system and stage-specific interventions for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Patrick M Lynch, Jeffrey S Morris, Sijin Wen, Shailesh M Advani, William Ross, George J Chang, Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas, Gottumukkala S Raju, Luigi Ricciardiello, Takeo Iwama and 19 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04094675 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Sirolimus for Cowden Syndrome With Colon Polyposis

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2019 to 2025Enrolled5ConditionsPTEN Gene Mutation, PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome, PTEN Hamartoma Syndrome, Cowden SyndromeArmsSirolimus
NCT07726771 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

ENDOPOL: Dye chromoENDOscopy Versus Virtual Chromoendoscopy for Assessment of the Ileo-anal Pouch in Patients With Familial Adenomatous POLyposis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon North West Healthcare NHS TrustRan2026 to 2031Enrolled50ConditionsFamilial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), Pouches, IleoanalArmsChromoendoscopy (Indigo Carmine), Virtual Chromoendoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Sirolimus for Colon Polyposis in PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Surgical Decision-Making in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Surgical aspects of indications and techniques for adenomatous polyposis variants].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Chemoprevention of hereditary colon cancers: time for new strategies.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Patrick M LynchDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jeffrey S MorrisDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sijin WenDepartment of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Shailesh M AdvaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
William RossDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
George J ChangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Miguel Rodriguez-BigasDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gottumukkala S RajuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Luigi RicciardielloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Takeo IwamaDepartment of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Benedito M RossiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Hereditary Cancer Registry, Hospital Sirio Libanes, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Maria PelliseDepartment of Gastroenterology, Institut de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques, Hospital Clinic, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Elena StoffelDivision of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Paul E WiseSection of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Lucio BertarioUnit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Brian SaundersWolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Marks Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Randall BurtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Andrea BelluzziDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Dennis AhnenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Nagahide MatsubaraDepartment of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Steffen BülowThe Danish Polyposis Register, Gastrointestinal Unit, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels JespersenThe Danish Polyposis Register, Gastrointestinal Unit, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susan K ClarkThe Polyposis Registry, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Steven H ErdmanDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Arnold J MarkowitzGastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Inge BernsteinDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aalborg Universitetshospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Niels De HaasDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aalborg Universitetshospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sapna SyngalDivision of Population Sciences, Division of Gastroenterology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gabriela MoesleinCenter for Hereditary Tumors, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University Witten-Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIt is not possible to accurately count adenomas in many patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Nevertheless, polyp counts are critical in evaluating each patient's response to interventions. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration no longer recognizes the decrease in polyp burden as a sufficient chemoprevention trial treatment endpoint requiring a measure of "clinical benefit." To develop endpoints for future industry-sponsored chemopreventive trials, the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumors (InSIGHT) developed an FAP staging and intervention classification scheme for lower-GI tract polyposis.

methodsTwenty-four colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy videos were reviewed by 26 clinicians familiar with diagnosis and treatment of FAP. The reviewers independently assigned a stage to a case by using the proposed system and chose a stage-specific intervention for each case. Our endpoint was the degree of concordance among reviewers staging and intervention assessments.

resultsThe staging and intervention ratings of the 26 reviewers were highly concordant (ρ = 0.710; 95% credible interval, 0.651-0.759). Sixty-two percent of reviewers agreed on the FAP stage, and 90% of scores were within ±1 stage of the mode. Sixty percent of reviewers agreed on the intervention, and 86% chose an intervention within ±1 level of the mode.

conclusionsThe proposed FAP colon polyposis staging system and stage-specific intervention are based on a high degree of agreement on the part of experts in the review of individual cases of polyposis. Therefore, reliable and clinically relevant means for measuring trial outcomes can be developed. Outlier cases showing wide scatter in stage assignment call for individualized attention and may be inappropriate for enrollment in clinical trials for this reason.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryGastroenterologistsSeverity of Illness IndexAdenomatous Polyposis ColiColectomyColonoscopyConsensusEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryNeoplasm StagingSigmoidoscopySulfasalazineVideo RecordingSulfasalazine

Identifiers

PMID26769407
PMCPMC5570515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.