ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2016
A proposed staging system and stage-specific interventions for familial adenomatous polyposis.
Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sirolimus for Cowden Syndrome With Colon Polyposis
ENDOPOL: Dye chromoENDOscopy Versus Virtual Chromoendoscopy for Assessment of the Ileo-anal Pouch in Patients With Familial Adenomatous POLyposis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the clinical practice of hereditary colorectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Guideline
- Endoscopic management of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after prophylactic colectomy or restorative proctocolectomy - systematic review of the literature.Radiology and oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Sirolimus for Colon Polyposis in PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-Risk of Cancer, Cancer Prevention, and Long-Term Consequences: Learnings from Five Decades with the Danish Polyposis Register.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Endoscopic prediction model for detecting advanced rectal polyps after ileorectal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis: a dual-center retrospective study.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Prognosis of Korean patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who did not undergo colectomy: a retrospective study.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Endoscopic scoring indices for assessing disease severity in familial adenomatous polyposis: Systematic review.Endoscopy international open · 2024Review
- Surgical Decision-Making in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024Review
- Usefulness of genotyping APC gene for individualizing management of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Personalized endoscopic surveillance and intervention protocols for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: the European FAP Consortium strategy.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2020 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021Article
- [Gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes].Der Internist · 2021Review
- Genotype-phenotype correlation in 99 familial adenomatous polyposis patients: A prospective prevention protocol.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Web-Based Model for Predicting Time to Surgery in Young Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: An Internally Validated Study.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2018Article
- [Surgical aspects of indications and techniques for adenomatous polyposis variants].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016Review
- Surgical considerations in FAP-related pouch surgery: Could we do better?Familial cancer · 2016Review
- Chemoprevention of hereditary colon cancers: time for new strategies.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsIt is not possible to accurately count adenomas in many patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Nevertheless, polyp counts are critical in evaluating each patient's response to interventions. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration no longer recognizes the decrease in polyp burden as a sufficient chemoprevention trial treatment endpoint requiring a measure of "clinical benefit." To develop endpoints for future industry-sponsored chemopreventive trials, the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumors (InSIGHT) developed an FAP staging and intervention classification scheme for lower-GI tract polyposis.
methodsTwenty-four colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy videos were reviewed by 26 clinicians familiar with diagnosis and treatment of FAP. The reviewers independently assigned a stage to a case by using the proposed system and chose a stage-specific intervention for each case. Our endpoint was the degree of concordance among reviewers staging and intervention assessments.
resultsThe staging and intervention ratings of the 26 reviewers were highly concordant (ρ = 0.710; 95% credible interval, 0.651-0.759). Sixty-two percent of reviewers agreed on the FAP stage, and 90% of scores were within ±1 stage of the mode. Sixty percent of reviewers agreed on the intervention, and 86% chose an intervention within ±1 level of the mode.
conclusionsThe proposed FAP colon polyposis staging system and stage-specific intervention are based on a high degree of agreement on the part of experts in the review of individual cases of polyposis. Therefore, reliable and clinically relevant means for measuring trial outcomes can be developed. Outlier cases showing wide scatter in stage assignment call for individualized attention and may be inappropriate for enrollment in clinical trials for this reason.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.