ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2016
Organ Damage and Quality of Life in Antiphospholipid Syndrome.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating antiphospholipid syndrome: from personalized therapies to cutting-edge research.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Review
- Pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome: clinical features and therapeutic interventions in a single center retrospective case series.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) affects young patients in the most productive years of their life, and the consequences of organic or tissue damage involve a decrease in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). While acute disease manifestations of APS are well known, information on the long-term prognosis and damage in affected patients is still very limited. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients would be expected to experience long-term complications and even die as a consequence of APS. Organ damage in APS has been evaluated using different methods and definitions, including the SLICC/ACR Damage Index (SDI), which tend to underestimate aPL-related damage. A new damage index in APS has been proposed (DIAPS), and it seems to be more accurate than SDI. Given the implications for morbidity and mortality, it is imperative to assess accurately aPL-related damage and HRQoL in patients with APS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26769306What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.