Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26769042›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2016

Antidepressant, anxiolytic and procognitive effects of rivastigmine and donepezil in the chronic mild stress model in rats.

Mariusz Papp, Piotr Gruca, Magdalena Lason-Tyburkiewicz, Paul Willner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antidepressant and anxiolytic potential ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  6. The 5-HTPsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariusz PappInstitute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smetna Street, 31-343, Krakow, Poland. nfpapp@cyfronet.pl.
Piotr GrucaInstitute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smetna Street, 31-343, Krakow, Poland.
Magdalena Lason-TyburkiewiczInstitute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smetna Street, 31-343, Krakow, Poland.
Paul WillnerDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Polish Academy of Sciences · PLMaj Institute of Pharmacology · PLSwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of depression in old age is complicated by frequent co-morbidity with cognitive impairment. Anti-dementia drugs have some efficacy to improve cognitive performance and there is an inconsistent literature regarding the effect of such drugs on depressive symptoms. Here, we have investigated whether anti-dementia drugs would have antidepressant-like and pro-cognitive effects in a well-validated animal model of depression and cognitive impairment, chronic mild stress (CMS).

methodsRats were subjected to CMS for a total of 8 weeks. After 2 weeks, subgroups of stressed and non-stressed animals were treated daily, for 5 weeks followed by 1 week of drug withdrawal, with vehicle, imipramine (10 mg/kg), rivastigmine (2 mg/kg), donepezil (0.3 mg/kg) or memantine (5 mg/kg). Sucrose intake was tested weekly, and animals were also tested in the elevated plus maze (at week 7) and in an object recognition task (at weeks 7 and 8).

resultsCMS decreased sucrose intake, had an anxiogenic effect in the elevated plus maze, and impaired performance in the object recognition test. Imipramine, rivastigmine and donepezil normalized performance in all three tests. Memantine had anxiolytic and pro-cognitive effects, but did not reverse CMS-induced anhedonia. DISCUSSION: The fact that all three anti-dementia drugs reversed CMS-induced cognitive impairment and that cholinesterase inhibitors, but not memantine, have antidepressant-like effects in this model suggest that different mechanisms may underlie CMS-induced anhedonia and cognitive impairment. We discuss the clinical implications of these findings.

Indexed as

AnhedoniaAnimalsAntidepressive AgentsCholinesterase InhibitorsCognitive DysfunctionDepressive DisorderDisease Models, AnimalDonepezilIndansMaleNootropic AgentsPiperidinesRatsRats, WistarRecognition, PsychologyRivastigmineAntidepressive AgentsCholinesterase InhibitorsDonepezilIndansNootropic AgentsPiperidinesRivastigmineAnhedoniaCholinesterase inhibitorsChronic mild stressDonepezilImipramineMemantineObject recognitionRatRivastigmine

Identifiers

PMID26769042
PMCPMC4801996
OpenAlexW2237323680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.