ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2016
Angina Pectoris and Myocardial Ischemia in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Role of Diagnostic Tests.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-nucleus profiling of the left ventricle of the mouse heart after chronic stress.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with acute coronary syndrome and no obstructive coronary artery disease.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Article
- Diagnostic Approach to Patients with Stable Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Arteries.European cardiology · 2019Review
- 'Primary' Microvascular Angina: Clinical Characteristics, Pathogenesis and Management.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2018Review
- Women with Stable Angina Pectoris and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Closer to a Diagnosis.European cardiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (NO-CAD) at angiography constitute a heterogeneous population. In most patients with stable exercise-induced chest pain, microvascular angina (MVA) is the likely diagnosis. Some clinical findings and results of diagnostic tests suggest that angina is caused by coronary microvascular (CMV) dysfunction rather than obstructive CAD, but a definitive diagnosis requires demonstration of impaired CMV dilation and/or increased constriction. About 10 % of patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome also shows NO-CAD at angiography, and CMV constriction can be responsible for the syndrome in a number of cases. Diagnostic tests are not expected to have a prognostic role in patients with stable MVA with normal coronary arteries, due to the excellent prognosis of these patients, whereas their prognostic role in the more general population of NO-CAD patients with chest pain (either stable or acute) needs to be established in adequate studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.