Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26768386›Full record

Observational studyThe Gerontologist2016

Military Generation and Its Relationship to Mortality in Women Veterans in the Women's Health Initiative.

Donna L Washington, Chloe E Bird, Michael J LaMonte, Karen M Goldstein, Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Marcia L Stefanick, Nancy F Woods, Lori A Bastian, Margery Gass, Julie C Weitlauf

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Gerontologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evidence Review-Social Determinants of Health for Veterans.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donna L WashingtonVA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, California. University of California Los Angeles, Geffen School of Medicine. donna.washington@va.gov.
Chloe E BirdRAND Corporation, Pardee Rand Graduate School, Santa Monica, California.
Michael J LaMonteDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Karen M GoldsteinDurham VA Health Care System, North Carolina.
Eileen Rillamas-SunFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seatle, Washington.
Marcia L StefanickStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Center for Health Research on Women & Sex Differences in Medicine, California.
Nancy F WoodsDivision of Biobehavioral Nursing & Health Systems, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle.
Lori A BastianVA Connecticut, and University of Connecticut Health Center, West Haven.
Margery GassThe North American Menopause Society, Mayfield Heights, Ohio.
Julie C WeitlaufVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Sierra Pacific MIRECC and Center for Innovation to Implementation, California. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, California.
North American Menopause Society · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

HSRD VA IK2 HX001540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the studyWomen's military roles, exposures, and associated health outcomes have changed over time. However, mortality risk-within military generations or compared with non-Veteran women-has not been assessed. Using data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), we examined all-cause and cause-specific mortality by Veteran status and military generation among older women. DESIGN AND

methodsWHI participants (3,719 Veterans; 141,802 non-Veterans), followed for a mean of 15.2 years, were categorized into pre-Vietnam or Vietnam/after generations based on their birth cohort. We used cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between Veteran status and mortality by generation.

resultsAfter adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and WHI study arm, all-cause mortality hazard rate ratios (HRs) for Veterans relative to non-Veterans were 1.16 (95% CI: 1.09-1.23) for pre-Vietnam and 1.16 (95% CI: 0.99-1.36) for Vietnam/after generations. With additional adjustment for health behaviors and risk factors, this excess mortality rate persisted for pre-Vietnam but attenuated for Vietnam/after generations. After further adjustment for medical morbidities, across both generations, Veterans and non-Veterans had similar all-cause mortality rates. Relative to non-Veterans, adjusting for sociodemographics and WHI study arm, pre-Vietnam generation Veterans had higher cancer, cardiovascular, and trauma-related morality rates; Vietnam/after generation Veterans had the highest trauma-related mortality rates (HR = 2.93, 1.64-5.23). IMPLICATIONS: Veterans' higher all-cause mortality rates were limited to the pre-Vietnam generation, consistent with diminution of the healthy soldier effect over the life course. Mechanisms underlying Vietnam/after generation Veteran trauma-related mortality should be elucidated. Efforts to modify salient health risk behaviors specific to each military generation are needed.

Indexed as

AgedCardiovascular DiseasesCohort EffectFemaleHumansKorean WarLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProportional Hazards ModelsUnited StatesVeteransVietnam ConflictWorld War IIWounds and InjuriesCohort effectLongitudinal studyMortalityWomen Veterans

Identifiers

PMID26768386
PMCPMC5881617
OpenAlexW2258130449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.