Quantifying the Risk of Different Types of Perinatal Death in Relation to Gestational Age: Researchers at Risk of Causing Confusion.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Epidemiology of elective induction of labour: a timeless exposure.International journal of epidemiology · 2024
   Article
2. The Global Pregnancy Collaboration (CoLab) symposium on short- and long-term outcomes in offspring whose mothers had preeclampsia: A scoping review of clinical evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2022
   Article
3. Bias in comparisons of mortality among very preterm births: A cohort study.PloS one · 2021
   Article
4. Maternal and neonatal factors associated with perinatal deaths in a South African healthcare institution.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2020
   Article
5. The curse of the perinatal epidemiologist: inferring causation amidst selection.Current epidemiology reports · 2018
   Article
6. Two denominators for one numerator: the example of neonatal mortality.European journal of epidemiology · 2018
   Article
7. The fetuses-at-risk approach: survival analysis from a fetal perspective.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2018
   Review
8. Methodological Challenges in International Comparisons of Perinatal Mortality.Current epidemiology reports · 2017
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  No Rates Were Harmed in the Making of This Paper: Response to Critiques.2016
• Comment on
  Implications of Using a Fetuses-at-Risk Approach When Fetuses Are Not at Risk.2016

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as