Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26768003›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2017

Oncology E-Learning for Undergraduate. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

René Aloisio da Costa Vieira, Ana Helena Lopes, Almir José Sarri, Zuleica Caulada Benedetti, Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Oncology and Radiation Oncology Awareness in Final Year Medical Students in Australia and New Zealand.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  5. Medical Hematology/Oncology Fellows' Perceptions of Online Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

René Aloisio da Costa VieiraPosgraduate Oncology Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, Bairro Dr Paulo Prata, Barretos, SP, CEP: 14.784.400, Brazil. reneacv@gmail.com.
Ana Helena LopesPosgraduate Oncology Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, Bairro Dr Paulo Prata, Barretos, SP, CEP: 14.784.400, Brazil.
Almir José SarriDepartment of Physiotherapy, Barretos, Brazil.
Zuleica Caulada BenedettiJundiaí School of Medicine, Jundiaí, Brazil.
Cleyton Zanardo de OliveiraBiostatistics and Epidemiology Nucleous, Barretos, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The e-learning education is a promising method, but there are few prospective randomized publications in oncology. The purpose of this study was to assess the level of retention of information in oncology from undergraduate students of physiotherapy. A prospective, controlled, randomized, crossover study, 72 undergraduate students of physiotherapy, from the second to fourth years, were randomized to perform a course of physiotherapy in oncology (PHO) using traditional classroom or e-learning. Students were offered the same content of the subject. The teacher in the traditional classroom model and the e-learning students used the Articulate® software. The course tackled the main issues related to PHO, and it was divided into six modules, 18 lessons, evaluated by 126 questions. A diagnosis evaluation was performed previous to the course and after every module. The sample consisted of 67 students, allocated in groups A (n = 35) and B (n = 32), and the distribution was homogeneous between the groups. Evaluating the correct answers, we observed a limited score in the pre-test (average grade 44.6 %), which has significant (p < 0.001) improvement in post-test evaluation (average grade 73.9 %). The correct pre-test (p = 0.556) and post-test (p = 0.729) evaluation and the retention of information (p = 0.408) were not different between the two groups. The course in PHO allowed significant acquisition of knowledge to undergraduate students, but the level of information retention was statistically similar between the traditional classroom form and the e-learning, a fact that encourages the use of e-learning in oncology. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: REBECU1111-1142-1963.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyCross-Over StudiesEducational MeasurementEducation, DistanceFemaleHumansKnowledgeMalePhysical Therapy SpecialtyProspective StudiesStudents, Health OccupationsYoung AdultEducationEducation, distanceEducation, higherOncologyPhysical therapy specialtyTeaching and methods

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.