GuidelineCancer science2015
2015 Guidance on cancer immunotherapy development in early-phase clinical studies.
Guideline in Cancer science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2015 Guidance on cancer immunotherapy development in early-phase clinical studies.Cancer science · 2015Guideline
- Sex-Specific Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Ketogenic Diet in a Mouse Model of Allergic Airway Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Specific humoral response in cancer patients treated with a VEGF-specific active immunotherapy procedure within a compassionate use program.BMC immunology · 2020Article
- Characterization of immune cell subtypes in three commonly used mouse strains reveals gender and strain-specific variations.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2019Article
- Current treatment options of T cell-associated immunotherapy in multiple myeloma.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2017Review
- Article
- Comparison of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes between primary and metastatic tumors in breast cancer patients.Cancer science · 2016Article
- Cancer Vaccines in Ovarian Cancer: How Can We Improve?Biomedicines · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of cancer immunotherapies is progressing rapidly with a variety of technological approaches. They consist of "cancer vaccines", which are based on the idea of vaccination, "effector cell therapy", classified as passive immunotherapy, and "inhibition of immunosuppression", which intends to break immunological tolerance to autoantigens or immunosuppressive environments characterizing antitumor immune responses. Recent reports showing clinical evidence of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive immunotherapies with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor-specific receptor gene-modified T cells indicate the beginning of a new era for cancer immunotherapy. This guidance summarizes ideas that will be helpful to those who plan to develop cancer immunotherapy. The aims of this guidance are to discuss and offer important points in early phase clinical studies of innovative cancer immunotherapy, with future progress in this field, and to contribute to the effective development of cancer immunotherapy aligned with the scope of regulatory science. This guidance covers cancer vaccines, effector cell therapy, and inhibition of immunosuppression, including immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.