Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26767864›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of internal medicine2016

Impact of dialysis modality on technique survival in end-stage renal disease patients.

Jong-Hak Lee, Sun-Hee Park, Jeong-Hoon Lim, Young-Jae Park, Sang Un Kim, Kyung-Hee Lee, Kyung-Hoon Kim, Seung Chan Park, Hee-Yeon Jung, Owen Kwon and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jong-Hak LeeClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Sun-Hee ParkClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jeong-Hoon LimClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Young-Jae ParkClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Sang Un KimClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Kyung-Hee LeeClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Kyung-Hoon KimClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Seung Chan ParkClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Hee-Yeon JungClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Owen KwonClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Ji-Young ChoiClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jang-Hee ChoClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Chan-Duck KimClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Yong-Lim KimClinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease in Korea, Daegu, Korea ; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThis study analyzed the risk factors for technique survival in dialysis patients and compared technique survival rates between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a prospective cohort of Korean patients.

methodsA total of 1,042 patients undergoing dialysis from September 2008 to June 2011 were analyzed. The dialysis modality was defined as that used 90 days after commencing dialysis. Technique survival was compared between the two dialysis modalities, and the predictive risk factors were evaluated.

resultsThe dialysis modality was an independent risk factor predictive of technique survival. PD had a higher risk for technique failure than HD (hazard ratio [HR], 10.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 62.0; p = 0.008) during a median follow-up of 11.0 months. In the PD group, a high body mass index (BMI) was an independent risk factor for technique failure (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.8; p = 0.036). Peritonitis was the most common cause of PD technique failure. The difference in technique survival between PD and HD was more prominent in diabetic patients with a good nutritional status and in non-diabetic patients with a poor nutritional status.

conclusionsIn a prospective cohort of Korean patients with end-stage renal disease, PD was associated with a higher risk of technique failure than HD. Diabetic patients with a good nutritional status and non-diabetic patients with a poor nutritional status, as well as patients with a higher BMI, had an inferior technique survival rate with PD compared to HD.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAdultAgedBody Mass IndexHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusPeritoneal DialysisProspective StudiesRepublic of KoreaRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBody mass indexDiabetesHemodialysisPeritoneal dialysisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID26767864
PMCPMC4712414
OpenAlexW2204565516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.