ReviewJournal of translational medicine2016
Translational research-the need of a new bioethics approach.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building capacity in translational research ethics among early-stage investigators: A pilot course on the ethics of the clinician-researcher dual-role.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Get this thing out of my body! Factors determining consent for translational oncology research: a qualitative research.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- The ethics of resource allocation in translational genomic medicine.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Creating a Research Ethics Consultation Service: Issues to Consider.Ethics & human research · 2021Article
- Facing new challenges to informed consent processes in the context of translational research: the case in CARPEM consortium.BMC medical ethics · 2021Review
- Advancing medical technology innovation and clinical translation via a model of industry-enabled technical and educational support: Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute's Medical Technology Advance Program.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: findings from a qualitative survey study among actors in France.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Identifying and Overcoming Roadblocks that Limit the Translation of Research Findings to the Achievement of Health Equity.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2019Article
- Adolescent mental health education InSciEd Out: a case study of an alternative middle school population.Journal of translational medicine · 2018Article
- GSK-3 Inhibitors and Tooth Repair: An Ethical Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Review
- Partnering with patients in translational oncology research: ethical approach.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Article
- Ethics of translational medical research.Tropical parasitologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Translational research tries to apply findings from basic science to enhance human health and well-being. Many phases of the translational research may include non-medical tasks (information technology, engineering, nanotechnology, biochemistry, animal research, economy, sociology, psychology, politics, and so on). Using common bioethics principles to these areas might sometimes be not feasible, or even impossible. However, the whole process must respect some fundamental, moral principles. The purpose of this paper is to argument the need for a different approach to the morality in translational bioethics, and to suggest some directions that might be followed when constructing such a bioethics. We will show that a new approach is needed and present a few ethical issues that are specific to the translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.