ArticlePublic health action2015
Treatment referral system for tuberculosis patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Article in Public health action, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding Delays in Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Bangladesh: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Ensuring continuous TB treatment across Asian borders.Public health action · 2024Article
- The role of counselling in tuberculosis diagnostic evaluation and contact tracing: scoping review and stakeholder consultation of knowledge and research gaps.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Nonadherence Predictors to Tuberculosis Medications among TB Patients in Gambella Region of Ethiopia.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022Article
- Factors affecting the successful implementation of the referral system: A scoping review.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021Article
- A review of mobile health interventions for public private mix in tuberculosis care.Internet interventions · 2021Review
- Is directly observed tuberculosis treatment strategy patient-centered? A mixed method study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the referral system in an urban DOTS-based programme in Dhaka, Bangladesh, including the peri-urban area, and to identify opportunities to strengthen the system.
designThis was a retrospective cohort study in which diagnosed tuberculosis (TB) patients and health providers from DOTS centres were interviewed. Research tools included pre-tested structured questionnaires and the TB patients' referral records.
resultsOf 4974 TB patients who were referred to the different treatment centres, only 1756 (35%) of the counterfoils of the referral slips were returned. Of 250 patients randomly selected for interview, 165 reported to a DOTS centre, 69 did not and 16 could not be traced. Variations in educational qualification, residence and the identification of DOTS centres after counselling were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Lower monthly income (RR = 7.84, RR = 5.03), distance from the centre (RR = 36.21) and those receiving treatment from pharmacies (RR = 3) or non-governmental organisations (RR = 28.48) have more risk of irregular treatment.
conclusionA high proportion of referred patients were registered and initiated treatment, but many did not report to the referral treatment centre. Proper counselling and taking into account the patients' preferences during referral are essential to address access barriers to treatment adherence and improved treatment outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.