ArticleThoracic cancer2014
Role of systemic inflammation scores in pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunological and Inflammatory Impact of Non-Intubated Lung Metastasectomy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
- Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery colorectal lung metastasectomy in non-intubated anesthesia.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Article
- Uniportal non-intubated lung metastasectomy.Journal of visualized surgery · 2017Article
- Lung metastasectomy: an experience-based therapeutic option.Annals of translational medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer can benefit from surgical removal. However, the biological determinants of postsurgical outcome are not completely elucidated. We evaluated the role of host systemic inflammation status in this setting.
methodsThe modified Glasgow prognostic score (based on serum C-reactive protein and albumin levels) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NTL) ratio were obtained from 44 patients who received curative-intent metastasectomy, and were used as indicators of systemic inflammation status. We tested the impact of both of these parameters on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as their correlation with other well-known prognosticators.
resultsFive-year PFS and OS rates were 18% and 49%, respectively. At univariate analysis, multiple metastases, disease-free interval <36 months, and a Glasgow score of 2 (P = 0.031) were significantly associated to a worse PFS rate. A NTL ratio >3 predicted disease progression in the short-term (P = 0.036), but the effect on late events was weaker (P = 0.079). Factors associated with worse OS were multiple metastasis (P = 0.002), elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (P = 0.009), a Glasgow score of 2 (P = 0.029), and a faster metastasis growth (P = 0.008). At Cox regression analysis, neither a Glasgow score of 2, nor elevated NTL ratio showed an independent effect on survival rates.
conclusionsSystemic inflammation scores did not perform well as independent survival prognosticators in patients undergoing curative-intent pulmonary metastasectomy. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate whether these measurements could still be useful when restricting the analysis to specific patient subcategories or to diverse postoperative phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.