ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2016
Transcriptional profiling reveals molecular basis and novel genetic targets for improved resistance to multiple fermentation inhibitors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses ofBiology · 2026Article
- Biotechnological applications of D-xylose-fermenting autochthonous yeasts in lignocellulosic biorefineries.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2026Review
- Combinatorial engineering approaches for improved lipid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.FEMS yeast research · 2026Article
- Regulatory mechanism of Haa1p and Hap4p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to mixed acetic acid and formic acid when fermenting mixed glucose and xylose.Microbial cell factories · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic Characterization of miRNAs inGenes · 2025Article
- Engineering transcriptional regulatory networks for improving second-generation fuel ethanol production inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Review
- Article
- Optimisation of the Ethanol Fermentation Process Using Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Cellulose Waste-Effect of Fermentation Pattern and Strain.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Contribution ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2023Article
- Adaptive laboratory evolution to obtain furfural tolerantFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- How adaptive laboratory evolution can boost yeast tolerance to lignocellulosic hydrolyses.Current genetics · 2022Review
- Effects of Inhibitors Generated by Dilute Phosphoric Acid Plus Steam-Exploded Poplar onMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Exploring Yeast Diversity to Produce Lipid-Based Biofuels from Agro-Forestry and Industrial Organic Residues.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Regulatory mechanism of Haa1p and Tye7p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae when fermenting mixed glucose and xylose with or without inhibitors.Microbial cell factories · 2022Article
- Mutations that alter Arabidopsis flavonoid metabolism affect the circadian clock.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022Article
- Formate Dehydrogenase Improves the Resistance to Formic Acid and Acetic Acid Simultaneously inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Response mechanisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the stress factors present in lignocellulose hydrolysate and strategies for constructing robust strains.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2022Review
- Rational and evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of dicarboxylic acids from lignocellulosic biomass and exploring genetic mechanisms of the yeast tolerance to the biomass hydrolysate.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2022Article
- Deletion ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLignocellulosic biomass is a promising source of renewable biofuels. However, pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass generates fermentation inhibitors that adversely affect the growth of industrial microorganisms such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and prevent economic production of lignocellulosic biofuels. A critical challenge on developing S. cerevisiae with improved inhibitor resistance lies in incomplete understanding of molecular basis for inhibitor stress response and limited information on effective genetic targets for increasing yeast resistance to mixed fermentation inhibitors. In this study, we applied comparative transcriptomic analysis to determine the molecular basis for acetic acid and/or furfural resistance in S. cerevisiae.
resultsWe recently developed a yeast strain YC1 with superior resistance to acetic acid, furfural, and their mixture through inverse metabolic engineering. In this study, we first determined transcriptional changes through RNA sequencing in YC1 versus the wild-type strain S-C1 under three different inhibitor conditions, including acetic acid alone, furfural alone, and mixture of acetic acid and furfural. The genes associated with stress responses of S. cerevisiae to single and mixed inhibitors were revealed. Specifically, we identified 184 consensus genes that were differentially regulated in response to the distinct inhibitor resistance between YC1 and S-C1. Bioinformatic analysis next revealed key transcription factors (TFs) that regulate these consensus genes. The top TFs identified, Sfp1p and Ace2p, were experimentally tested as overexpression targets for strain optimization. Overexpression of the SFP1 gene improved specific ethanol productivity by nearly four times, while overexpression of the ACE2 gene enhanced the rate by three times in the presence of acetic acid and furfural. Overexpression of SFP1 gene in the resistant strain YC1 further resulted in 42 % increase in ethanol productivity in the presence of acetic acid and furfural, suggesting the effect of Sfp1p in optimizing the yeast strain for improved tolerance to mixed fermentation inhibitor.
conclusionsTranscriptional regulation underlying yeast resistance to acetic acid and furfural was determined. Two transcription factors, Sfp1p and Ace2p, were uncovered for the first time for their functions in improving yeast resistance to mixed fermentation inhibitors. The study demonstrated an omics-guided metabolic engineering framework, which could be developed as a promising strategy to improve complex microbial phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.