Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26766961›Full record

ArticleNutrition & metabolism2016

Baseline insulin sensitivity affects response to high-amylose maize resistant starch in women: a randomized, controlled trial.

Barbara A Gower, Richard Bergman, Darko Stefanovski, Betty Darnell, Fernando Ovalle, Gordon Fisher, S Katherine Sweatt, Holly S Resuehr, Christine Pelkman

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition & metabolism, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Consumption of SolnulNutrients · 2023
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara A GowerDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 616A Webb Building, 1675 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA.
Richard BergmanCedars-Sinai Diabetes and Obesity Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Darko StefanovskiNew Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
Betty DarnellClinical Research Unit, UAB, Birmingham, USA.
Fernando OvalleDepartment of Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, UAB, Birmingham, USA.
Gordon FisherDepartment of Human Studies, UAB, Birmingham, USA.
S Katherine SweattDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, UAB, Birmingham, USA.
Holly S ResuehrDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, UAB, Birmingham, USA.
Christine PelkmanIngredion, Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ USA.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USIngredion (United States) · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARBARA A GOWER · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS)UL1TR001417 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2015 to 2018
$31.4M
UAB CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE (CCTS) UL1: BPCAUL1RR025777 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2008 to 2011
$22.3M
University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Kirk Michael Habegger · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
UAB Diabetes Research and Training CenterP60DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GARVEY, W TIMOTHY · 2008 to 2012
$8.4M
UAB Pre-Doctoral Training Program in Obesity-Related ResearchT32HL105349 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARBARA A GOWER · 2010 to 2026
$5.7M
UAB Obesity Training ProgramT32DK062710 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI James O Hill, Brooks C Wingo · 2004 to 2026
$5.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001417NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025777NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL105349NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK079626NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK062710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResistant starch (RS) is a type of dietary fiber that can improve glucose metabolism, but its effects may be modulated by sex or baseline insulin sensitivity. This study was designed to examine the effect of high-amylose maize resistant starch (HAM-RS2) on insulin sensitivity (SI) in women, and to determine if SI status affects the response to RS.

methodsThis was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study. Participants were 40 healthy, non-diabetic women aged 22-67 years in the normal-weight to obese BMI range (20.6-47.4 kg/m(2)). Two doses of HAM-RS2 were tested, 15 and 30 g per day, administered in the form of cookies. Participants were randomized to the order in which they received the experimental and placebo product. Each arm was 4 weeks, with a 4-week wash-out period in between. SI was assessed at the end of each 4-week arm of product consumption by frequently-sampled, insulin-modified, intravenous glucose tolerance test and minimal modeling. Participants were categorized as being insulin resistant (IR; SI < 7.8) or insulin sensitive (IS; SI ≥ 7.8) based on Gaussian analysis. The effect of treatment arm on SI was examined by mixed-model analysis within IR and IS sub-groups, using all available data. In addition, SI was examined by ANOVA among just those women who completed all three arms of the study with valid SI results.

resultsAmong IR participants, SI was on average ~16 % higher after the 30 g arm when compared to the control arm by mixed-model analysis (n = 40, P < 0.05), and tended to be 23 % higher by ANOVA among women who completed all arms (n = 23, P = 0.06). HAM-RS2 did not affect SI in IS women.

conclusionConsumption of HAM-RS2 at 30 g/day in the form of a snack food item was associated with improved insulin sensitivity in women with insulin resistance. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT0152806.

Indexed as

Intravenous glucose tolerance testMinimal model

Identifiers

PMID26766961
PMCPMC4711008
OpenAlexW2238529928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.