SynthesisPloS one2016
What Is Citizen Science?--A Scientometric Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
96 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ethical Challenges and Opportunities at the Intersection of One Health and Open Science in India: A Scoping Review.Open research Europe · 2025Pooled it
- Citizen science for monitoring the health and well-being related Sustainable Development Goals and the World Health Organization's Triple Billion Targets.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Pooled it
- Detection and Surveillance of InvasiveInsects · 2026Review
- Article
- A new experimental approach to manipulate social identity and social norms about protective behaviors in a virtual social environment.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- "Scientific or democratic?" Bridging the implementation gap of citizen science through the study of social-symbolic objects.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Snakes among citizens: distribution and ecology of the Aesculapian snake, Zamenis longissimus (Laurenti, 1768) in Bratislava revealed by citizen science.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Social, mobility and contact networks in shaping health behaviours and infectious disease dynamics: a scoping review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2025Article
- Recycle and reuse: an ethological perspective for citizen science data on Lucanus cervus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae).Journal of insect science (Online) · 2025Article
- How can citizen science enhance mental health research quality: theory of change development.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Thousands of students gain science research literacy and agency by conducting immersive Drosophila research projects tailored to the health interests of their communities.Developmental biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Who is saving our streamflow data? Exploring volunteer profiles and their engagement in the SIREN data rescue project.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Delineating the contours of citizen science: Development of the ECSA characteristics of citizen science.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Citizen-engaged research for improved perceptions of riparian systems.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Community perceptions of citizen science approach in pandemic preparedness and response in South and Southeast Asian countries.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Citizen science for research in public health: perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Protected insect species in Italy: occurrence data from a 10-year citizen science initiative.Biodiversity data journal · 2025Article
36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe concept of citizen science (CS) is currently referred to by many actors inside and outside science and research. Several descriptions of this purportedly new approach of science are often heard in connection with large datasets and the possibilities of mobilizing crowds outside science to assists with observations and classifications. However, other accounts refer to CS as a way of democratizing science, aiding concerned communities in creating data to influence policy and as a way of promoting political decision processes involving environment and health.
objectiveIn this study we analyse two datasets (N = 1935, N = 633) retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) with the aim of giving a scientometric description of what the concept of CS entails. We account for its development over time, and what strands of research that has adopted CS and give an assessment of what scientific output has been achieved in CS-related projects. To attain this, scientometric methods have been combined with qualitative approaches to render more precise search terms.
resultsResults indicate that there are three main focal points of CS. The largest is composed of research on biology, conservation and ecology, and utilizes CS mainly as a methodology of collecting and classifying data. A second strand of research has emerged through geographic information research, where citizens participate in the collection of geographic data. Thirdly, there is a line of research relating to the social sciences and epidemiology, which studies and facilitates public participation in relation to environmental issues and health. In terms of scientific output, the largest body of articles are to be found in biology and conservation research. In absolute numbers, the amount of publications generated by CS is low (N = 1935), but over the past decade a new and very productive line of CS based on digital platforms has emerged for the collection and classification of data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.